UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities

Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrant þ

Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement

¨Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

þ Definitive Proxy Statement

¨ Definitive Additional Materials

¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to Section 240.14a-11c or Section 240.14a-12§240.14a-12

AGILYSYS, INC.

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)


(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement)


Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box)all boxes that apply):

þNo fee required.
¨Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
(1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)Total fee paid:

Payment of Filing

No fee required

Fee (Check the appropriate box):

¨Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
¨Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form of Schedule and the date of its filing.
(1)Amount Previously Paid:
paid previously with preliminary materials

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11


(2)Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:




(3)Filing Party:

(4)Date Filed:




a2017proxystatementv6_image1.jpg

img117445957_0.gif 



NOTICE OF 20172022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS


To be held on August 16, 2017

26, 2022



Please join us for the Agilysys, Inc. 20172022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on Wednesday,Friday, August 16, 2017,26, 2022, at 8:00 a.m., localPacific time, at the company’sCompany’s offices 5383 Hollister Avenue,at 6775 Edmond Street, Suite 120, Santa Barbara, California 93111.

100, Las Vegas, NV 89118.

The purposes of the Annual Meeting are:

1.
To elect the seven director nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement;
1.To elect the director nominees named in the attached Proxy Statement;


2.
To vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, to approve the compensation of our named executive officers set forth in the Proxy Statement;
2.To vote, on a non-binding advisory basis, to approve the compensation of our named executive officers set forth in the Proxy Statement;


3.
To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2023; and
3.To ratify the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2018; and


4.
To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.
4.To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Shareholders of record at the close of business on July 7, 2017,June 24, 2022, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. It is important to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting, regardless of whether you plan to attend.attend in person. In addition to voting by mail, you may vote by telephone or Internet.internet. Please refer to your enclosed proxy card and the Proxy Statement for information regarding how to vote by telephone or Internet.internet. If you choose to vote by mail, please sign, date, and promptly return your proxy card in the enclosed envelope.


By Order of the Board of Directors,


Michael A. Kaufman

Chairman of the Board of Directors



July 18, 2017









19, 2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials

for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on August 16, 2017.

26, 2022.

The Proxy Statement and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the

fiscal year ended March 31, 2017,2022, are available at www.agilysys.com.







a2017proxystatementv6_image1.jpg


img117445957_1.gif 

PROXY STATEMENT

2017

2022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

August 16, 2017




26, 2022

ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION


General Information


This Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card are being provided in connection with the solicitation by the board of directors of Agilysys, Inc., an Ohio Corporationa Delaware corporation (“Agilysys,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us”), to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held at 8:00 a.m., Pacific time, on August 16, 2017,26, 2022, and any adjournments or postponements of the Annual Meeting. The Annual Meeting will be held at 8:00 a.m., localPacific time, at the Company’s offices at 5383 Hollister Avenue,6775 Edmond Street, Suite 120, Santa Barbara, California 93111.100, Las Vegas, NV 89118. Our principal executive office is located at 425 Walnut Street,1000 Windward Concourse, Suite 1800, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202.250, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005. The purposes of the Annual Meeting are stated in the accompanying Notice. This Proxy Statement, the enclosed proxy card, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172022 (“20172022 Annual Report”), are first being mailed to shareholders and made available electronically on our website at www.agilysys.com beginning on or about July 18, 2017.


19, 2022.

Record Date, Voting Shares, and Quorum


Shareholders of record of our common shares and Convertible Preferred Stock at the close of business on July 7, 2017,June 24, 2022, the “Record Date,” are entitled to notice of and to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 23,327,81525,018,020 common shares and 1,735,457 shares of Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.vote. Each common share and each share of Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled to one vote. The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the commontotal combined shares outstanding at the close of business on the Record Date will constitute a quorum for the transaction of business at the Annual Meeting. We will include abstentions and broker non-votes in the number of common shares present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining a quorum. A broker non-vote occurs when a nominee holding shares for a beneficial owner has not received instructions from the beneficial owner and does not have discretionary authority to vote the shares. Our common shares are listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “AGYS.”AGYS. References within this Proxy Statement to our common shares or shares refer to our common shares, without par value, and references within this Proxy Statement to our shares refer to both our common shares and shares of Convertible Preferred Stock, which are the only classclasses of securities entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.


How to Vote


If you are the record holder of common shares, you or your duly authorized agent may vote by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card in the envelope provided. This year, youYou may also vote by telephone or Internet.internet. Telephone and Internetinternet voting information is provided on your proxy card. A control number, located on the proxy card, is designed to verify your identity, allow you to vote your shares, and confirm that your voting instructions have been properly recorded. Please note the deadlines for voting by telephone, the Internet,internet, and proxy card as set forth on the proxy card. If you vote by telephone or Internet,internet, you need not return your proxy card. You may also attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person; however, we encourage you to vote your shares in advance of the Annual Meeting even if you plan on attending. If your common shares are held by a bank, or broker or any other nominee, you must follow the voting instructions provided to you by the bank, broker, or nominee. Although most



1



banks and brokers offer voting by mail, telephone, and the Internet,internet, availability and specific procedures will depend on their voting arrangements.

Unless revoked, common shares represented by a properly signed and returned proxy card (or other valid form of proxy), or as instructed via telephone or Internet,internet, received in time for voting will be voted as instructed. If your proxy card is signed and returned with no instructions given, the persons designated as proxy holders on the proxy card will vote as follows:


FOR the election of each director nominee named herein (proposal 1);
FOR the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (proposal 2); and
FOR the ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (proposal 3).


The Company knows of no other matters scheduled to come before the Annual Meeting. If any other business is properly brought before the Annual Meeting, your proxy gives discretionary authority to the proxy holders with respect to such business, and the proxy holders intend to vote the proxy as recommended by our board of directors with regard to any such business, or, if no such recommendation is given, the proxy holders will vote in their own discretion.


Revocability of Proxies


You may revoke or change your vote at any time before the final vote on the matter is taken at the Annual Meeting by submitting to our Secretary a notice of revocation or by timely delivery of a valid, later-dated, duly executed proxy by mail, telephone, or Internet.internet. You may also revoke or change your vote by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.electronically. If your shares are held by a bank, broker, or other nominee, you must contact the bank, broker, or nominee and follow their instructions for revoking or changing your vote.


Vote Required, Abstentions, and Broker Non-Votes


If a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, the nominees named herein for election as directors in proposal 1 will be elected if they receive the greatesta greater number of votes cast at the Annual Meeting present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote.“for” their election than votes “against” their election. Abstentions will have no effect on the election of directors.


For each of proposal 2 (advisory vote on named executive officer compensation) and proposal 3 (ratification of independent registered public accounting firm), if a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting, the affirmative vote of the holders of shares representing a majority of the common shares present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote will be required to approve each proposal.

The effect of an abstention is the same as a vote against each proposal.of proposals 2 and 3. If you hold your shares in street name and do not give your broker or nominee instruction as to how to vote your shares with respect to proposalsproposal 2, and 3, your broker or nominee will not have discretionary authority to vote your shares on proposals 2 and 3.proposal 2. These broker non-votes will have no effect on proposals 2 and 3.


Cumulative Voting

Each shareholder has the rightproposal 2.

Proposal 3 is considered a “routine proposal” on which your broker or nominee will have discretionary authority to vote cumulativelyyour shares if you do not give voting instructions, and accordingly we do not expect any broker non-votes to result from proposal 3.

No Cumulative Voting

Under our certificate of incorporation, our stockholders do not have cumulative voting rights in the election of directors if the shareholder gives written notice not less than 48 hours before the Annual Meeting commences to our Chief Executive Officer or Secretary that he, she, or it wants its voting for the election of directors to be cumulative. In such event, the shareholder giving notice, or a representative of such shareholder, the Chairman, or the Secretary, will make an announcement about such notice at the start of the Annual Meeting. Cumulative voting means that the shareholder may cumulate his, her, or its voting power for the election of directors by distributing a number of votes, determined by multiplying the number of directors to be elected at the Annual Meeting times the number of such shareholder’s shares. The shareholder may distribute all of the votes to one individual director nominee or distribute the votes among two or more director nominees, as the shareholder chooses. In the event of cumulative voting, unless contrary instructions are received, the persons named in the enclosed proxy will vote the shares represented by valid proxies on a cumulative basis for



2



the election of the nominees named herein, allocating the votes among the nominees in accordance with their discretion.

directors.

Proxy Solicitation


The cost of solicitation of proxies, including the cost of preparing, assembling, and mailing the Notice, Proxy Statement, and proxy card, will be borne by us.the Company. In addition to solicitation by mail, arrangements may be made with brokerage houses and other custodians, nominees, and fiduciaries to send proxy materials to their principals, and we may reimburse them for their expenses in so doing. Our officers, directors, and employees may, without additional compensation, personally or by other appropriate means request the return of proxies.


Attending the Annual Meeting


All holders of our common shares at the close of business on the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, are authorized to attend the Annual Meeting. Cameras, recording devices, and other electronic devices will not be permitted at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your common shares through a bank, broker, or other nominee, you will need to bring a copy of the brokerage statement reflecting your share ownership as of the Record Date, or a legal proxy from your bank or broker, to attend the meeting.


Voting Results


Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Within four business days following the Annual Meeting, final results, or preliminary results if final results are unknown, will be announced on a Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). If preliminary results are announced, final results will be announced on a Form 8-K filed with the SEC within four business days after the final results are known.


Company Information


Our 20172022 Annual Report is being mailed with this Proxy Statement. These documents also are available electronically on our website at www.agilysys.com,under Investor Relations. Our 20172022 Annual Report and the other information available on or through our


website is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not to be considered proxy solicitation material. If you wish to have additional copies of our 20172022 Annual Report, we will mail copies to you without charge. Requests may be sent to our corporate services officeheadquarters at: Agilysys, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 1000 Windward Concourse, Suite 250, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005, or you may request copies through our website, under Investor Relations. These documents have been filed with the SEC and also may be accessed from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting or these proxy materials, please contact Investor Relations by telephone at 770-810-7948,770-810-7941, or by email at investorrelations@agilysys.com, or through our website under Investor Relations.



CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Guidelines”) adopted by our board of directors are intended to provide a sound framework to assist the board of directors in fulfilling its responsibilities to shareholders. Under the Guidelines, the board of directors exercises its role in overseeing the Company by electing qualified and competent officers and by monitoring the performance of the Company. The Guidelines state that the board of directors and its committees exercise oversight of executive officer compensation and director compensation, succession planning, director nominations, corporate governance, financial accounting and reporting, internal controls, strategic and operational issues, and compliance with laws and regulations. The Guidelines also state the board of directors’ policy regarding eligibility for the board of directors, including director independence and qualifications for director candidates, events that require resignation from the board of directors, service on other public company boards of directors, and stock ownership guidelines. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee annually reviews the Guidelines and makes recommendations for changes to the board of directors. The Guidelines are available on our website at www.agilysys.com, under Investor Relations.



3




Code of Business Conduct


The Code of Business Conduct adopted by our board of directors applies to all directors, officers, and employees of the Company, as well as certain third parties, and incorporates additional ethics standards applicable to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and other senior financial officers of the Company, and any person performing a similar function. The Code of Business Conduct is reviewed annually by the Audit Committee, and recommendations for change are submitted to the board of directors for approval. The Code of Business Conduct is available on our website at www.agilysys.com, under Investor Relations. The Company has in place a reporting hotline and website available for use by all employees and third parties, as described in the Code of Business Conduct. Any employee or third-party can anonymously report potential violations of the Code of Business Conduct through the hotline or website, both of which isare managed by an independent third party. Reported violations are promptly reported to and investigated by the Company. Reported violations are addressed by the Company and, if related to accounting, internal accounting controls, or auditing matters, the Audit Committee. In addition, we intend to post on our website all disclosures that are required by law or NASDAQ listing standards concerning any amendments to, or waivers from, any provision of the Code of Business Conduct.


Director Independence


NASDAQ listing standards provide that at least a majority of the members of the board of directors must be independent, meaning free of any material relationship with the Company, other than his or her relationship as a director. The Guidelines state that the board of directors should consist of a substantial majority of independent directors. A director is not independent if he or she fails to satisfy the standards for director independence under NASDAQ listing standards, the rules of the SEC, and any other applicable laws, rules, and regulations. During the board of directors’ annual review of director independence, the board of directors considers transactions, relationships, and arrangements, if any, between each director or a director’s immediate family members and the Company or its management. In June 2017,May 2022, the board of directors performed its annual director independence review and, as a result, of such review determined that each of Donald Colvin, Dana Jones, Jerry Jones, Michael A. Kaufman, Melvin Keating, Keith M. Kolerus, and John Mutch qualify as independent directors. Ramesh Srinivasan is not independent because of his service as President and CEO of the Company.


Director Attendance


The board of directors held sixnine meetings during fiscal year 2017,2022, and no director attended less than 75% of the aggregate of the total number of board of director meetings and meetings held by committees of the board of directors on which hethe director served. Independent directors meet regularly in executive session at board of director and committee meetings, and executive sessions are chaired by the chairman of the board or by the appropriate committee chairman. It is the board of directors’ policy that all of its members attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders absent exceptional cause. All of the Directors attended the 20162021 Annual Meeting.


Meeting of Shareholders.


Shareholder Communication with Directors


Shareholders and others who wish to communicate with the board of directors as a whole, or with any individual director, may do so by sending a written communication to such director(s) in care of our Secretary at our Alpharetta, Georgia office address, and our Secretary will forward the communication to the specified director(s).


Committees of the Board


During fiscal year 2017,2022, the board of directors had fourthree standing committees: Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Strategic Review Committee. The Strategic Review Committee was disbanded in February 2017. Mr. Srinivasan is not a member of any committee. At the end of the fiscal year, and as of July 7, 2017, the members and chairmanchairperson of each committee were as follows:




4





Director



Audit



Compensation

Nominating and

Corporate

Governance


Strategic
Review

Donald Colvin*

Chairman

Chair

Jerry Jones

Dana Jones*

X

X

Jerry Jones

X

X

Michael A. Kaufman

X

ChairmanChairman

Chair

Melvin Keating

Chairman

Chair

X

X

Keith M. KolerusXX

John Mutch*

X

X

X


*Qualifies as an Audit Committee Financial Expert.


As of July 15, 2022, the committee membership set forth above remained the same.

Committee Charters. The board of directors has adopted a charter for each committee, other than the Strategic Review Committee, and each committee with a charter is responsible for the annual review of its respective charter. Charters for each committee are available on our website at www.agilysys.com, under Investor Relations.


Audit Committee. The Audit Committee held nineeight meetings during fiscal year 2017.2022. The Audit Committee reviews, with our independent registered public accounting firm, the proposed scope of our annual audits and audit results, as well as interim reviews of quarterly reports; reviews the adequacy of internal financial controls; reviews internal audit functions; is directly responsible for the appointment, determination of compensation, retention, and general oversight of our independent registered public accounting firm; reviews related person transactions; oversees the Company’s implementation of its Code of Business Conduct; and reviews any concerns identified by either the internal or external auditors. The board of directors determined that all Audit Committee members are financially literate and independent under NASDAQ listing standards for audit committee members. The board of directors also determined that each of Ms. Jones and Messrs. Colvin and Mutch each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC rules.


Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee held four meetings during fiscal year 2017.2022. The purpose of the Compensation Committee is to enhance shareholder value by ensuring that pay available to the board of directors, Chief Executive Officer, and other executive officers enables us to attract and retain high-quality leadership and is consistent with our executive pay philosophy. As part of its responsibility, the Compensation Committee oversees our pay plans and policies; annually reviews and determines all pay, including base salary, annual cash incentive, long-term equity incentive, and retirement and perquisite plans; administers our incentive programs, including establishing performance goals, determining the extent to which performance goals are achieved, and determining awards; administers our equity pay plans, including making grants to our executive officers; and regularly evaluates the effectiveness of the overall executive pay program and evaluates our incentive plans to determine if the plans’ measures or goals encourage inappropriate risk-taking by our employees.executives. A more complete description of the Compensation Committee’s functions is found in the Compensation Committee Charter. The board of directors determined that all Compensation Committee members are independent under NASDAQ listing standards for compensation committee members.


Our Legal and Human Resources Departments support the Compensation Committee in its work and, in some cases, as a result of delegation of authority by the Compensation Committee, fulfill various functions in administering our pay programs. In addition, the Compensation Committee has the authority to engage the services of outside consultants and advisers to assist it. The Committee engages compensation consultants to perform current market assessments when it believes that such an assessment would inform its decision making with respect to executive compensation. The Compensation Committee did not engage a compensation consultant to advise it in connection with setting compensation for the Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2017.

2022.

Our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel attend Compensation Committee meetings when executive compensation, Company performance, and individual performance are discussed and evaluated by Compensation Committee members, and they provide their thoughts and recommendations on executive pay issues during these meetings and provide updates on financial


performance, industry status, and other factors that may impact executive compensation. Decisions regarding the Chief Executive Officer’s compensation were based solely on the Compensation Committee’s deliberations, while compensation decisions regarding other



5



executive officers took into consideration recommendations from the Chief Executive Officer. Only Compensation Committee members make decisions on executive officer compensation and approve all outcomes.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee (“Nominating Committee”) held threefour meetings during fiscal year 2017.2022. The board of directors determined that all Nominating Committee members are independent under NASDAQ listing standards. The Nominating Committee assists the board of directors in finding and nominating qualified people for election to the board; reviewing shareholder-recommended nominees; assessing and evaluating the board of directors’ effectiveness; and establishing, implementing, and overseeing our governance programs and policies. The Nominating Committee is responsible for reviewing the qualifications of, and recommending to the board of directors, individuals to be nominated for membership on the board of directors. The board of directors has adopted Guidelines for Qualifications and Nomination of Director Candidates (“Nominating Guidelines”), and the Nominating Committee considers nominees using the criteria set forth in the Nominating Guidelines. At a minimum, a director nominee must:


Be of proven integrity with a record of substantial achievement;
Have demonstrated ability and sound business judgment based on broad experience;
Be able and willing to devote the required amount of time to the Company’s affairs, including attendance at board of director and committee meetings;
Be analytical and constructive in the objective appraisal of management’s plans and programs;
Be committed to maximizing shareholder value and building a sound company, long-term;
Be able to develop a professional working relationship with other directors and contribute to the board or directors’ working relationship with senior management of the Company;
Be able to exercise independent and objective judgment and be free of any conflicts of interest with the Company; and
Be able to maintain the highest level of confidentiality.

The Nominating Committee considers the foregoing factors, among others, in identifying nominees; however, there is no policy requiring the Nominating Committee to consider the impact of any one factor by itself. The Nominating Committee also will consider the board of directors’ current and anticipated needs in terms of number, diversity, specific qualities, expertise, skills, experience, and background. In addition, the Corporate Governance Guidelines state that the board of directors should have a balanced membership, with diverse representation of relevant areas of experience, expertise, and backgrounds. The Nominating Committee seeks nominees that collectively will build a capable, responsive, and effective board of directors, prepared to address strategic, oversight, and governance challenges. The Nominating Committee believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of the directors as a group should provide a significant mix of experience, knowledge, and abilities that will enable the board of directors to fulfill its responsibilities.


The Nominating Committee will consider shareholder-recommended nominees for membership on the board of directors. For a shareholder to properly nominate a candidate for election as a director at a meeting of the shareholders, the shareholder must be a shareholder of record at the time the notice of the nomination is given and at the time of the meeting, be entitled to vote at the meeting in the election of directors, and have given timely written notice of the nomination to the Secretary. To be timely, notice must be received by the Secretary, in the case of an annual meeting, not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the anniversary of the previous year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that if the date of the annual meeting is advanced more than 30 days prior to or delayed by more than 30 days after the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice must be delivered not later

than the close of business on the later of the 90th90th day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th10th calendar day following
the day on which public disclosure of the date of such annual meeting is first made. In the case of a special meeting, timely notice must be received by the Secretary not later than the close of business on the 10th10th day after the date of such meeting is first publicly disclosed. A shareholder’s notice must set forth, as to each candidate:


Name, age, business address, and residence address of the candidate;


6



Principal occupation or employment of the candidate;
Class and number of shares that are owned of record or beneficially by the candidate;
Information about the candidate required to be disclosed in a proxy statement complying with the rules and regulations of the SEC;
Written consent of the candidate to serve as a director if elected and a representation that the candidate does not and will not have any undisclosed voting arrangements with respect to his or her actions as a director, will comply with the Company’s Amended Code of Regulations and all other publicly disclosed corporate governance, conflict of interest, confidentiality, and share ownership and trading policies and Company guidelines;
Name and address of the shareholder making such nomination and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made;


Class and number of shares that are owned of record or beneficially by the shareholder and by any such beneficial owner as of the date of the notice;
Representation that the shareholder or any such beneficial owner is a holder of record or beneficially of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting and intends to remain so through the date of the meeting;
Description of any agreement, arrangement, or understanding between or among the shareholder and any such beneficial owner and any other persons (including their names) with respect to such nomination;
Description of any agreement, arrangement, or understanding in effect as of the date of the shareholder’s notice pursuant to which the shareholder, any such beneficial owner, or any other person directly or indirectly has other economic interests in the shares of the Company;
Representation that the shareholder intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; and
Representation whether the shareholder intends to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of outstanding common shares and/or otherwise to solicit proxies in support of the nomination.

The Nominating Committee may request additional information from such nominee to assist in its evaluation. The Nominating Committee will evaluate any shareholder-recommended nominees in the same way it evaluates nominees recommended by other sources, as described above.


Strategic Review Committee. The Strategic Review Committee met only informally during fiscal year 2017. The purpose of the Strategic Review Committee was to review and evaluate strategic alternatives to the Company’s current strategy and to recommend to the board of directors what action, if any, should be taken by the Company. For fiscal year 2017, the members of the Strategic Review Committee took a leading role in the search for a successor chief executive officer, including conducting interviews, discussing candidates and reporting to the board of directors their findings and opinions. Following the selection of the new chief executive officer, the board of directors determined that the Strategic Review Committee was no longer necessary, and it was disbanded.

Board Leadership


The board of directors determined that having an independent director serve as chairman of the board is in the best interest of shareholders at this time. The structure ensures a greater role for our independent directors in the oversight of the Company and the active participation in setting agendas and establishing priorities and procedures for the board of directors. Pursuant to the board of directors’ Corporate Governance Guidelines, it is our policy that the positions of chairman of the board and chief executive officer be held by different individuals, except as otherwise determined by the board of directors. Mr. Kaufman has served as Chairman of the Board since 2015.


The board has established the role of vice-chairman of the board to assist the chairman of the board in the performance of his duties, as directed by the chairman from time to time. Mr. Kolerus has served as vice-chairman of the board since 2015.


7




Risk Oversight


Management is responsible for the day-to-day management of risks facing the Company, while theCompany. The board of directors, as a whole and through its committees, particularly the Audit Committee, is actively involved in the oversight of such risks. The board of directors’ role in risk oversight includes regular reports at board of director and Audit Committee meetings from members of senior management on areas of material risk to the Company, including strategic, financial, operational, and legal and regulatory compliance risks. Management regularly identifies and updates, among other items, the population of possible risks for the Company, assigns risk ratings, prioritizes the risks, assesses likelihood of risk occurrence, develops risk mitigation plans for prioritized risks, and assigns roles and responsibilities to implement mitigation plans. Risks are ranked by evaluating each risk’s likelihood of occurrence and magnitude. The board of directors’ Compensation Committee, in consultation with management, evaluates our incentive plans to determine if the plans’ measures or goals encourage inappropriate risk-taking by our employees. As part of its evaluation, the Compensation Committee determined that the performance measures and goals were tied to our business, financial, and strategic objectives. As such, the incentive plans are believed not to encourage risk-taking outside of the range of risks contemplated by the Company’s business plan.


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation


None of the members of the Compensation Committee during fiscal year 20172022 (Messrs. Jones, Kaufman, Keating, Kolerus, and Mutch) is or has been an officer or employee of the Company or has had any relationship with the Company required to be disclosed as a related person transactionstransaction, and none of our executive officers served on the compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) or board of any company that employed any member of our Compensation Committee or our board of directors during fiscal year 2017.



2022.

Policy on Hedging of Shares

We do not have any practices or policies regarding hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of the Company’s equity securities.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION


During fiscal year 2017,2022, the board of directors approved compensation for non-employee directors consistedconsisting of the following:

$25,00030,000 annual cash retainer for each non-employee director;


$35,000 annual cash retainer for the chairman of the board;
$15,000 annual cash retainer for the chairman of the Audit Committee (increased from $10,000 beginning January 1, 2017);Committee;
$12,500 annual cash retainer for the chairman of the Compensation Committee;
$7,500 annual cash retainer for the chairmenchairman of each of the Compensation and Nominating & Corporate Governance Committees;Committee;
$10,000 annual cash retainer for each member of the Audit, Nominating & Corporate Governance, and Compensation Committees, including each chairman; and
$10,000 annual cash retainer to each member of the Strategic Review Committee, including the chairman;
$5,000 monthly cash retainer for each member of the Strategic Review Committee, including the chairman;
An award of restricted shares to each non-employee director valued at $70,000$75,000 on the grant date.

We also reimburse our directors for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses in connection withincurred for attendance at board of directors and committee meetings.


The fiscal year 20172022 equity award for each director consisted of 6,0711,435 restricted shares, based on a $11.53the closing price of the Company’s common stock of $52.23 on the date the grant date price,was approved by the board of directors, and was granted under the 2016 Stock2020 Equity Incentive Plan. The restricted shares vested on March 31, 2017,2022, and provided for pro-rata vesting upon retirement prior to March 31, 2017. The grant was made in June 2017 to the then current non-employee directors; however, Mr. Kaufman declined the award given the significant ownership in the Company by his firm, MAK Capital.



8




2022.

Our directors are subject to share ownership guidelines that require ownership of either (i)common stock with a market value of three times the director’s .respectiverespective annual cash retainer within two years of service and six times the director’s respective annual cash retainer within four years of service; or (ii) 15,000 shares within the first two years following the director’s election to the board of directors and 45,000 shares within four years of election.service. We pay no additional fees for board of director or committee meeting attendance.


Director Compensation for Fiscal Year 2017


DirectorFees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(1)Stock Awards ($)(2)
Total
  ($)
Donald Colvin45,000 65,992 110,992 
Jerry Jones45,000 65,992 110,992 
Michael A. Kaufman132,500   132,500 
Keith M. Kolerus45,000 65,992 110,992 
Melvin Keating97,500 65,992 163,492 
John Mutch90,000 65,992 155,992 

2022

Director (1)

Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)(2)

Stock Awards ($)(3)

Total ($)

Donald Colvin

55,000

75,000

130,000

Dana Jones

50,000

75,000

125,000

Jerry Jones

50,000

75,000

125,000

Michael A. Kaufman

92,500

75,000

167,500

Melvin Keating

62,500

75,000

137,500

John Mutch

50,000

75,000

125,000

(1) Our CEO, Ramesh Srinivasan, is also a member of the board of directors, but he receives no direct compensation for such service.

(2) Fees are paid quarterly.

(3) Amounts in this column represent the fair value of the restricted shares computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 718 based on a grant date of May 27, 2021. The closing price of the Company’s common stock on May 27, 2021, was $52.23.


(2)Amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of the restricted shares computed in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 718.

PROPOSAL 1

ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


PROPOSAL 1
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


General

Our board of directors currently consists of seven members whose term expires at this Annual Meeting. In each case, subject to their earlier death, resignation, removal or retirement, the directors remain in office until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified, notwithstanding the expiration of the otherwise applicable term.


Nominees for Director


Upon the recommendation of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, comprised of independent directors, the board of directors has nominated each of Donald Colvin, Dana Jones, Jerry Jones, Michael A. Kaufman, Melvin Keating, Keith M. Kolerus, John Mutch and Ramesh Srinivasan for election to the board of directors for a term of one year, to serve until the annual meeting of shareholders in 20182023 and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified, subject to their earlier death, resignation, retirement or removal. Information concerning the nominees for election at this Annual Meeting is set forth below.


Unless authority to vote for any of these nominees is withheld, the shares represented by a validly executed proxy will be voted “FOR” the election of each of Ms. Jones and Messrs. Colvin, Jones, Kaufman, Keating, Kolerus, Mutch and Srinivasan for a one-year term. Each nominee has indicated his or her willingness to serve as a director, if elected.


A biography for each director nominee follows and, if applicable, arrangements under which a director was appointed to the board of directors or information regarding any involvement in certain legal or administrative



9



proceedings is provided. Additional information about the experiences, qualifications, attributes, or skills of each director and director nominee in support of his or her service on the board of directors is also provided.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES


Donald Colvin

Age 6469

Director since 2015


Interim Chief Financial OfficerMr. Colvin is a director of Isola GroupViavi Solutions Inc. (Nasdaq: VIAV), a global provider of network test, monitoring and assurance solutions, and a director of Maxeon Solar (Nasdaq: MAXN). He was formerly a director of UTAC Holdings, Ltd., a private Singapore technology company, and a director of Applied Micro Circuits Corporation from June 20152007 to July 2016.2011. Mr. Colvin previously served as Chief Financial Officer of Caesars Entertainment Corporation from November 2012 to January 2015 and before that was Executive Vice President and CFOChief Financial Officer of ON Semiconductor Corp. from April 2003 to October 2012. Prior to joining ON Semiconductor, Mr. Colvinhe held a number of financial leadership positions, including Vice President of Finance and CFOChief Financial Officer of Atmel Corporation, CFOChief Financial Officer of European Silicon Structures as well as several financial roles at Motorola Inc.

Mr. Colvin is a director of Viavi Solutions Inc. (Nasdaq: VIAV), a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Isola Group, a director of UTAC (a private Singapore company) and a member of the Advisory Board for Conexant. Mr. Colvin holds aearned his B.A. in economicsEconomics, with honors, and an M.B.A. from the University of Strathclyde in Scotland. Mr. Colvin’s qualifications and extensive experience include financial management, capitalstructure, financial strategy, significant public company leadership and board experience, and recent experience in the hospitality industry which the Company serves.


Dana Jones

Age 47

Director since 2019

Dana Jones is the Chief Executive Officer, President, and a director of RealPage, Inc. a provider of software and data analytics for the real estate industry. Prior to RealPage, Ms. Jones was the Chief Executive Officer of Sparta Systems, the market leader in digital enterprise quality management software for the life sciences space, from March 2018 until March 2021 when Sparta was acquired by Honeywell (Nasdaq: HON). She also served as a director of RealPage, Inc. (Nasdaq: RP), from October 2019 to April 2021 when the company was acquired by Thoma Bravo. Prior to joining Sparta in April 2018, Dana served as Chief Executive Officer of Active Network, the leader in activity and event management software, during 2016 and 2017. Before joining Active Network, Ms. Jones was Chief Marketing Officer and Senior Vice President of Products for Sabre Airline Solutions, a global provider of software to the airline industry, from 2012 to 2017. Prior to Sabre, Ms. Jones co-founded Noesis Energy, and served as Executive Vice President of Product, Sales, Marketing, and Operations. Ms. Jones has held Executive and General Management positions for early stage and global publicly traded enterprise software companies over the last 20 years, including the Reynolds Company and Vignette. She started her career as a management consultant with A.T. Kearney.

Ms. Jones also serves on the board of directors of Zapata Computing, a leading enterprise software company for NISQ-based quantum applications.


Ms. Jones graduated Summa Cum Laude and holds a BSE in industrial and operations engineering from the University of Michigan. Ms. Jones is an accomplished software executive with decades of experience leading and growing cloud-based global enterprise software businesses.

Jerry Jones

Age 6166

Director since 2012


Mr. Jones is the Executive Vice President, Chief Ethics and Legal Officer Executive Vice-President of Acxiom Corporation,LiveRamp Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: RAMP), a marketing technology and servicessoftware-as-a-service (SaaS) company since 1999.that provides the identity platform for powering exceptional experiences. His responsibilities include oversight of its legal, privacy and security teams and various strategic initiatives, including the strategy and execution of mergers and alliances.alliances, as well as serving as a director of most wholly owned subsidiary companies. Prior to joining LiveRamp, which is the successor entity to Acxiom Corp., in September 2018, Mr. Jones was the Chief Ethics and Legal Officer at Acxiom since 1999, where he oversaw all legal and data ethics matters. Prior to joining Acxiom, Mr. Jones was a partner with the Rose Law Firm in Little Rock, Arkansas, where he specialized in problem solving and business litigation for 19 years, representing a broad range of business interests. Previously he was a directorDirector of Entrust, Inc. He(Nasdaq: ENTU).

Mr. Jones is a 1980 graduate of the University of Arkansas School of Law and holds a bachelor’s degree in public administration from the University of Arkansas. As the Chief Ethics and Legal Officer of a technologySaaS company, Mr. Jones has extensive experience with legal, privacy, and security matters. He has also led the strategy and execution of mergers and alliances and international expansion efforts.


Michael A. Kaufman

Age 4550

Director since 2014


Mr. Kaufman is the PresidentChief Executive Officer of MAK Capital, a financial investment advisory firm based in New York, NY, which he founded in 2002. In addition, Mr. Kaufman has served as a director of Skyline Champion Corporation (NYSE: SKY) since June 2018.

Mr. Kaufman holds a B.A. degree in Economics from the University of Chicago, where he also received his M.B.A. He also earned a law degree from Yale University. As PresidentChief Executive Officer of MAK Capital, a significant shareholder of the Company’s largest shareholder,Company, Mr. Kaufman is uniquelyespecially qualified to represent the interests of the Company’s shareholders as a director and chairman of the board. Additionally, Mr. Kaufman’s qualifications and experience include capital markets, investment strategy and financial management.


Melvin Keating

Age 7075

Director since 2015


Director

Mr. Keating has been a consultant, providing investment advice and other services to private and public companies and private equity firms since 2008. Mr. Keating also serves as a director of MagnaChip Semiconductor CorpCorporation (NYSE: MX) since, a specialist in OLED panel technology and a designer/manufacturer of analog and mixed signal semiconductor platform solutions (since August 2016. Mr. Keating2016). Previously he was a Directordirector of Vitamin Shoppe Inc., a retailer of nutritional supplements, from April 2018 until it was taken private in December 2019, and Red Lion Hotels Corporation (NYSE: RLH) from July 2010 until June 2017, andserving as Chairman of the Board from May 2013 to 2015. Since November 2008,During the past five years, Mr. Keating has beenalso served on the boards of directors of the following public companies: SPS Commerce, Inc., a consultantprovider of cloud-based supply chain management solutions (from March 2018 to several private equity firmsMay 2019), API technologies Corp. (2011 to 2016), ModSys international Limited (formerly BluePhoenix solutions Limited, 2010 to 2016), and public companies, representing industries where he previously worked. Prior to that, he was President and CEO of Alliance Semiconductor from 2005 to 2008. Harte Hanks Inc. a global marketing services firm (2017 until July 2020).

Mr. Keating holds a B.A. from Rutgers University as well as both an M.S. in Accounting and an M.B.A. in Finance from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania. Mr. Keating has substantial experience leading public companies in the technology and hospitality industries and is qualified in global operations, financial management and strategy and capital markets.




10



Keith M. Kolerus

John Mutch

Age 7165

Director since 19982009


Mr. Mutch has served as managing partner of MV Advisors LLC (“MV Advisors”), a strategic block investment firm that provides focused investment and strategic guidance to small and mid-cap technology companies, since founding the firm in December 2005. From December 2008 to January 2014, Mr. Mutch served as President, CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company from 2008 to 2015.BeyondTrust Software, a privately-held security software company. Mr. Kolerus alsoMutch has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors of Minco Technology Labs, a manufacturer of high reliability semiconductors, from 2010 to 2015, ACI Electronics, LLC, from 2004 to 2008, and National Semiconductor Japan Ltd., from 1995 to 1998. He holds a bachelor of engineering degree from Vanderbilt University and an M.B.A. from Loyola University, Chicago. Mr. Kolerus has extensive experience in engineering, global operations, private and public companies, software and hardware technology companies, government contracting, capital markets, financial management, and the technology industry. Mr. Kolerus’ prior extensive experience leading boardsboard of directors also qualify him to serveof Aviat Networks, Inc. (Nasdaq: AVNW), a global provider of microwave networking solutions, since February 2015, and has served on ourthe board of directors.


John MutchAge 61Director since 2009

Founder and managing partner of MV Advisors LLC.directors since January 2015. Previously, Mr. Mutch founded MV Advisors in January of 2006 as a strategic block investment firm which provides focused investment and operational guidance to both private and public companies. MV Advisors’ current portfolio includes companies in the technology, active lifestyle and sports segments valued in excess of $100M. Mr. Mutch’s career as an operating executive in the technology sector includes serving as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of BeyondTrust software from 2008 to 2013, as a Director and Chief Executive Officer of Peregrine Systems (Nasdaq: PRGS) from 2003 to 2005, and as a Director and Chief Executive Officer on HNC Software (Nasdaq: HNCS) from 1999 to 2002. Previously he spent eight years in a variety of executive sales and marketing positions at Microsoft Corporation. Mr. Mutch current servesserved on the board of directors of Maxwell Technologies, Inc. (formerly Nasdaq: MXWL), a manufacturer of energy storage and power delivery solutions for automotive, heavy transportation, renewable energy, backup power, wireless communications and industrial and consumer electronics applications, from April 2017 to May 2019, YuMe, Inc. (NYSE: YUME), a provider of digital video brand advertising solutions, from July 2017 to February 2018, at which time the company was acquired by RhythmOne PLC (LON: RTHM), a technology-enabled digital media company, and Mr. Mutch continued serving as a director on the RhythmOne PLC board of directors until January 2019, and Steel Excel, Inc. (Nasdaq: (formerly


OTCPK:SXCL). , a provider of drilling and production services to the oil and gas industry and a provider of event-based sports services and other health-related services, from 2007 to May 2016.

Mr. Mutch holds a B.S. Inin Economics from Cornell University and an M.B.A. from the University of Chicago. As a former chief executive officer and board member of many technology companies, Mr. Mutch has extensive experience in the technology industry, restructuring, financial management and strategy, capital markets, sales management, and marketing.


Ramesh Srinivasan

Age 5762

Director since 2017


Mr. Srinivasan has been President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since January 3, 2017. He also serves on the board of advisors for Symbotic, a supply chain robotics and solutions company. He previously served as Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Ooyala, a Silicon Valley based provider of a suite of technology offerings in the online video space, from January 2016 to November 2016. From March 2015 to November 2015, he was President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Innotrac Corporation,Corp., an ecommerce fulfillment provider which merged with eBay Enterprise to form Radial IncInc. in 2015. Prior to that, he wasMr. Srinivasan served as President and Chief Executive OfficerCEO of Bally Technologies Inc. (NYSE: BYI) from December 2012 untilto May 2014, and President and COO from April 2011 untilto December 2014 he was President and Chief Operating Officer of Bally Technologies Inc., where2012; he started as Executive Vice President of Bally Systems in March 2005. Mr. Srinivasan was with Manhattan Associates from 1998 to 2005, where his last position was Executive Vice-President of Warehouse Management Systems.

Mr. Srinivasan holds a Post-Graduate Diploma in Management (MBA) from the Indian Institute of Management, Bangalore, India, and a degree in Engineering from the Indian Institute of Technology (Banaras Hindu University), Varanasi, India. Mr. Srinivasan has close to 3nearly three decades of hands-on enterprise software development, execution and senior technology management leadership and strategy expertise and accomplishments, including experience and expertise in driving performance at high growth technology companies and helping them scale their business profitably.





Board Diversity Matrix

The NASDAQ diversity matrix is set forth below as required under the listing requirements of NASDAQ.

Board Diversity Matrix (As of June 30, 2022)

Total Number of Directors

7

 

Female

Male

Non-Binary

Did Not Disclose Gender

Directors

1

5

 

1

Number of Directors who identify in Any of the Categories Below:

African American or Black

 

 

 

 

Alaskan Native or Native American

 

 

 

 

Asian

 

1

 

 

Hispanic or Latin

 

 

 

 

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

 

 

 

 

White

1

4

 

 

Two or More Races or Ethnicities

 

 

 

 

LGBTQ+

-

Did Not Disclose Demographic Background

1

One of our directors also identifies as being of U.K. origin.

Vote Required


If a quorum is present at the annual meeting,

Each of the nominees for election as directors will be elected if they receive the greatest number of votes cast at“for” such nominee’s election exceeds the Annual Meeting present in person or represented by proxy and entitled to vote.number of votes cast “against” such nominee’s election. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the election of directors.




11



Recommendation of the Board of Directors


THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES. PROXY CARDS RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES UNLESS THE SHAREHOLDER SPECIFIES OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.



EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following are biographies for each of our current, non-director executive officers. The biography for Mr. Srinivasan, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and a director, is provided above.

NameAgeCurrent PositionPrevious Positions
Tony Pritchett35Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since June 2017.Interim Vice President from November 2016 to June 2017. Senior Director of Operations from March 2015 to November 2016, Controller from August 2013 to March 2015, and Divisional Controller of the Retail Solutions Group from January 2012 to August 2013. Controller of Cypress Communications from October 2011.
Kyle C. Badger49Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since October 2011.Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at Richardson Electronics, Ltd. from 2007 to October 2011.
Rehan Jaddi45Senior Vice President, Customer Support & Service Solutions, since December 2014.Vice President of Product Engineering, from June 2012 to December 2014. Principal Group Program Manager at Microsoft from 2004 to 2012.
Chris Robertson46Corporate Controller and Treasurer, since June 2017.Corporate Controller from February 2017 to June 2017. Managing Director at Grant Thornton LLP from 2010 to January 2017.
Larry Steinberg49Senior Vice President and Chief Technology Officer since June 2012.Principal Development Manager, Microsoft Corporation from August 2009 to May 2012, and Principal Architect from June 2007 to July 2009; Founder and Chief Technology Officer of Engyro Corporation from March 1995 to May 2007.
Jimmie Walker57Senior Vice President, Global Revenue since January 2016.Vice President, Sales and Marketing November 2014 to January 2016. Vice President of Sales, Codeforce 360 from May 2013 to October 2014. Business Development Principal, Edutainment Media from October 2005 to May 2013.



BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON SHARES


The following table shows the number of common shares beneficially owned as of July 7, 2017,June 30, 2022, by (i) each current director; (ii) our Named Executive Officers employed with the Company on July 7, 2017;Officers; (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) each person who is known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our common shares.

Percent of common shares are calculated based on 26,761,440 shares of common stock, consisting of 25,025,983 shares of common stock outstanding on June 30, 2022, and 1,735,457 shares of common stock into which 1,735,457 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding on June 30, 2022, are now convertible.

Name

Common Shares

Common Shares Subject to Exercisable Options

Restricted Common Shares

Total Common Shares Beneficially Owned (1)

Percent of Class

Series A Convertible Preferred Shares (2)

Percent of Class

Directors and Nominees

Donald Colvin

  30,867

  —

  2,322

  33,189

*

  —

*

Dana Jones

  11,941

  —

  2,322

  14,263

*

  —

*

Jerry Jones

  55,807

  —

  2,322

  58,129

*

  —

*

Michael A. Kaufman (3)

  4,139,814

  —

  2,322

  4,142,136

  15.5

  1,735,457

  100

Melvin Keating

  39,536

  —

  2,322

  41,858

*

  —

*

John Mutch

  38,101

  —

  2,322

  40,423

*

  —

*

Named Executive Officers

Ramesh Srinivasan

  686,583

  471,831

  —

  1,158,414

  4.3

  —

*

William David ("Dave") Wood

  23,099

  53,991

  12,705

  89,795

*

  —

*

Kyle Badger

  110,061

  115,108

  4,144

  229,313

*

  —

*

Don DeMarinis

  11,262

  52,555

  3,701

  67,518

*

  —

*

Chris Robertson

  10,016

  34,251

  6,455

  50,722

*

  —

*

All current directors and
executive officers (18 persons)

  5,267,585

  913,034

  69,720

  6,250,339

  22.6

  1,735,457

  100

Other Beneficial Owners

MAK Capital One LLC et al
590 Madison Avenue, 9th Floor
New York, New York 10022

3,952,064 (3)

 

 

 

  14.8

  —

*

BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055

3,107,241 (4)

 

 

 

  11.6

  —

*

Nine Ten Capital Management LLC et al
1603 Orrington Ave, Ste 1650
Evanston, IL 60201

1,743,677 (5)

 

 

 

  6.5

  —

*

The Vanguard Group, Inc.
100 Vanguard Blvd.
Malvern, PA 19355

1,637,507 (6)

 

 

 

  6.1

  —

*

Artisan Partners Limited Partnership et al
875 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 800
Milwaukee, WI 53202

1,412,608 (7)

 

 

 

  5.3

  —

*

* Less than 1%.


(1)


12





Name


Common Shares
Shares Subject
to Exercisable Options

Restricted
Shares (1)
Total Shares
Beneficially Owned (1)

Percent of
Class (2)
Directors and Nominees     
Donald Colvin9,349 
 7,113
 16,462 *
Jerry Jones34,289 
 7,113
 41,402 *
Michael A. Kaufman (3)7,056,934 
 
 7,056,934 30.3
Keith M. Kolerus147,566 
 
 147,566 *
Melvin Keating13,193 
 7,113
 20,306 *
John Mutch18,583 
 7,113
 7,113 *
Named Executive Officers     
Kyle C. Badger46,498 74,566
 57,177
 178,241 *
Tony Pritchett8,141 6,328
 28,701
 43,170 *
Ramesh Srinivasan60,000 
 91,463
 151,463 *
Larry Steinberg113,849 102,444
 80,644
 296,937 1.3
Jimmie Walker, Jr.4,567 9,525
 95,509
 109,601 *
All directors and executive officers7,542,340 215,473
 432,061
 8,175,648 34.7
Other Beneficial Owners     
MAK Capital One, LLC et al
590 Madison Avenue, 9th Floor
New York, New York 10022
7,056,934 (4)   30.3
RGM Capital, LLC
9010 Strada Stell Court, Suite 105
Naples, FL 34109
2,256,143 (5)   9.7
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP 6300 Bee Cave Road
Building One
Austin, Texas, 78746
1,853,517 (6)   8.0
BlackRock, Inc.
55 East 52nd Street
New York, New York 10055
1,850,929 (7)   7.9
Discovery Group I, LLC
300 South Wacker Drive,
Suite 600
Chicago, Illinois 60606
1,581,797 (8)   6.8

(1)BeneficialUnless otherwise noted, beneficial ownership of the shares comprises both sole voting and dispositive power, or voting and dispositive power that is shared with a spouse, except for restricted shares for which individual has sole voting power but no dispositive power until such shares vest.
(2)* indicates beneficial ownership of less than 1% on July 7, 2017.
(3)Comprised entirely of shares beneficially owned by MAK Capital One L.L.C. Mr. Kaufman is the managing member of MAK Capital One L.L.C. and shares voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares.
(4)As reported on a Schedule 13D/A dated May 12, 2015. MAK Capital One LLC has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares. MAK Capital One LLC serves as the investment manager of MAK Capital Fund LP (“MAK Fund”) and MAK-ro Capital Master Fund LP (“MAK-ro Fund”). MAK GP LLC is the general partner of MAK Fund and MAK-ro Fund. Michael A. Kaufman, managing member and controlling person of MAK GP LLC and MAK Capital One L.L.C., has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares. MAK Fund has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to 3,424,973 shares. MAK-ro Fund has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to


13



1,859,675 shares. Paloma International L.P. (“Paloma”), through its subsidiary Sunrise Partners Limited Partnership, and S. Donald Sussman, controlling person of Paloma, have shared voting and dispositive power or voting and dispositive power that is shared with respecta spouse, except for restricted shares for which the individual has sole voting power but no dispositive power until such shares vest.
(2)
Each share of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock is convertible into one share of common stock, at any time on a one-for-one basis, subject to 1,772,286 shares.anti-dilution adjustment and certain approvals, if required, and has no expiration date.
(3)
MAK Capital One L.L.C. (“MAK Capital”) beneficially owns 3,952,064 shares of common stock, inclusive of 1,735,457 shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of 1,735,457 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Convertible Preferred Shares”) owned by MAK Capital Fund LP (“MAK Fund”) and MAK Capital Distressed Debt Fund I, LP (“MAK CDD Fund”), representing 15.0% of the outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. Mr. Kaufman beneficially owns 4,138,379 shares of common stock, inclusive of the Convertible Preferred Shares, representing 15.7% of the outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. MAK Fund beneficially owns 3,498,408 shares, representing 13.3% of the outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. MAK CDD Fund


beneficially owns 297,507 shares, representing 1.1% of the outstanding shares on a fully diluted basis. MAK Capital acts as the investment manager of MAK Fund and MAK CDD Fund. Michael A. Kaufman is the managing member of MAK Capital. Each of MAK Fund and MAK CDD Fund shares voting power and investment power with MAK Capital and Mr. Kaufman. The principal business address of MAK Capital One LLC, MAK GP LLCCDD Fund and Mr. Kaufman is 590 Madison Avenue, 9th9th Floor, New York, New YorkNY 10022. The principal address of MAK Fund is c/o Dundee Leeds Management Services Ltd., 129 Front Street, Hamilton, HM 12, Bermuda.
(4)
As reported on a Schedule 13G/A dated January 27, 2022. Blackrock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 3,082,620 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all the shares.
(5)
As reported on a Schedule 13G/A dated February 9, 2022, filed by Nine Ten Capital Management LLC and Russell Mollen.
(6)
As reported on a Schedule 13G/A dated February 9, 2022. The principal business addressVanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to none of MAK-ro Fund is c/o Dundee Leeds Management Services Ltd., Waterfront Centre, 2nd Floor, 28 N. Church Street, P.O. Box 2506, Grand Cayman KY1-1104, Cayman Islands. The principal address of Palomathe shares, shared voting power with respect to 37,370 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 1,583,021 shares, and Sunriseshared dispositive power with respect to 54,486 shares.
(7)
As reported on a Schedule 13G dated February 4, 2022, filed by Artisan Partners Limited Partnership, is Two America Lane, Greenwich, Connecticut 06836-2571.Artisan Investments GP LLC, Artisan Partners Holdings LP and Artisan Partners Asset Management Inc. The principal business address for Mr. Sussman is 217 Commercial Street, Portland, Maine 04101.
On May 31, 2011, MAK Fund, Paloma and Computershare Trust Company, N.A. (the “Trustee”) entered into an Amended and Restated Voting Trust Agreement (the “Revised Voting Trust Agreement”) to clarify the effect on theArtisan Partners entities have sole voting trust created by the Voting Trust Agreement dated as of December 31, 2009, were the reporting persons (named above) to beneficially own one-third or more of the Company’s outstanding voting securities as a result of a decrease in the total number of voting securities outstanding.  In such event, regardless of the reporting persons’ economic interest in the Company, its voting power will be effectively limited to no more than 23% or 27% of the voting securities in the event of a shareholder vote on (i) a merger, consolidation, conversion, sale or disposition of stock or assets or other business combination which requires approval of two-thirds of the Company’s voting power (a “Strategic Transaction”) or (ii) a transaction other than a Strategic Transaction which requires approval of two-thirds of the Company’s voting power (an “Other Transaction”), respectively. In connection with a Strategic Transaction or Other Transaction, the reporting persons would continue to possess the total voting power only over a number of voting securities that would equal the total voting power it would possess were it to hold only one-third of the voting securities. The Revised Voting Trust Agreement will become effective if and when the number of shares owned by the reporting persons equals or exceeds one-third of the voting securities then outstanding as a result of a decrease in the total number of voting securities outstanding.  Until such time, the Voting Trust Agreement will remain in full force and effect.
The Voting Trust Agreement provides that, for transactions requiring at least two-thirds of the voting power to approve, Trustee will vote shares as follows: (i) for a Strategic Transaction, vote shares that exceed 20% of the outstanding shares in favor of, against, or abstaining from voting in the same proportion as all other shares voted by shareholders (including reporting persons’ shares that do not exceed the 20% threshold); and (ii) for Other Transactions, vote shares that exceed 25% of the outstanding shares in favor of, against, or abstaining from voting in the same proportion as all other shares voted by shareholders (including reporting persons’ shares that do not exceed the 25% threshold). The Voting Trust Agreement terminates (i) if the vote necessary to approve all forms of transactions is lowered to the affirmative vote of holders of shares entitling them to exercise at least a majority of the voting power on the proposal to approve such transactions (from two-thirds); (ii) if MAK Fund and Paloma are no longer members of a “group” for purposes of Section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act, then the Voting Trust Agreement terminates with respect to any of MAK Fund and Paloma that beneficially owns not more than 20%none of the outstanding shares; (iii) on February 18, 2020, or February 18, 2025 if MAK Fund continuesshares, shared voting power with respect to hold 20%1,168,605 shares, sole dispositive power with respect to none of the outstanding shares; or (v) if another person or entity holds greater than 20% of the outstanding shares, that are not subjectand shared dispositive power with respect to a similar voting agreement.1,412,608 shares.
(5)As reported on a Schedule 13G/A dated February 13, 2017. RGM Capital, LLC has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares. Robert G. Moses is the managing member of RGM Capital, LLC, and shares voting and dispositive power with respect to all of the shares.
(6)As reported on a Schedule 13G/A dated February 9, 2017. Dimensional Fund Advisors LP has sole voting power with respect to 1,804,368 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all of the shares.
(7)As reported on a Schedule 13G/A dated January 18, 2017.
(8)As reported on a Schedule 13D/A dated May 18, 2017. Discovery Group has shared voting and dispositive power with respect to all the shares with Discovery Equity Partners, L.P. Discovery Group is the investment manager of Discovery Equity Partners. The business address of Discovery Equity Partners is 300 South Wacker Drive, Suite 600, Chicago, Illinois 60606.



SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE


Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act requires the Company’s directors and certain of its executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s common shares to file reports of and changes in ownership with the SEC. Based solely on the Company’s review of copies of SEC filings it has received or filed, the Company believes that each of its directors, executive officers, and beneficial owners of more than 10% of the



14



shares satisfied the Section 16(a) filing requirements during fiscal year 2017, except as follows: (i)2022, other than: Mr. Srinivasan filed a late Form 3 and Form 4 reporting his appointment ason June 15, 2021, which was 1 day late due to an executive officer and stock settlement appreciation rights granted to him in January 2017, (ii)administrative error by the Company; Mr. Walker fileJacks filed a late Form 4 on August 9, 2021, which was 1 day late due to the Company's delay in calculating withholding taxes; and Mr. DeMarinis filed a Form 4 on August 18, 2021, which was 1 day late due to his delay in reporting the details of the transaction to the Company.


EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following are biographies for shares purchased througheach of our employee stock purchase program in fiscal year 2017,current, non-director executive officers. The biography for Mr. Srinivasan, our President and (iii) Messrs. Badger, Pritchett, SteinbergChief Executive Officer, and Walker filed late Forms 4 reporting tax withholding in March 2017.



a director, is provided above.

Name

Age

Current Position

Previous Positions

William David (“Dave”) Wood III

44

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since June 2020.

Vice President – Corporate Strategy & Investor Relations from June 2019 to May 2020. Vice President – Finance from June 2017 to June 2019. Senior Director, Financial Planning & Analysis from June 2016 to June 2017. Director, Financial Planning & Analysis from August 2013 to June 2016.

Kyle Badger

54

Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since October 2011.

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at Richardson Electronics, Ltd. from 2007 until October 2011.

Prakash Bhat

59

Vice President and Managing Director, India, since March 2017.

Vice President, India Operations, at Radial Omnichannel Technologies India, from November 2015 until March 2017. Vice President, Bally Technologies India, from September 2005 to August 2014.

Prabuddha Biswas

62

Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer since April 2018.

Chief Technology Officer, Alert Logic, from August 2015 until April 2018. Vice President of Engineering, Airbiquity, from June 2013 until August 2015. Senior Vice President of Engineering, Medio Systems, from June 2011 until June 2013.

Don DeMarinis

58

Senior Vice President Sales and Marketing, Americas, since January 2018.

Chief Commercial Officer, Global, QikServe Limited, from April 2017 until January 2018. Executive Vice President/Chief Revenue Officer, Gusto, from June 2016 until April 2017. Vice President, Sports, Leisure & Entertainment Business Unit, Oracle/MICROS, January 2011 until June 2016.

Jeba Kingsley

49

Vice President, Professional Services since December 2018.

Vice President, Global Services, Scientific Games, from November 2014 until November 2017. Vice President, Professional Services, Bally Technologies, from March 2013 until November 2014. Senior Director, Professional Services, Bally Technologies, from April 2010 until February 2013.

Sridhar Laveti

55

Sr. Vice President of Established, Emerging Products and Customer support since June 2020.

Vice President of Established Products and Customer Support since September 2017.

Vice President, Business Transformation from May 2017 until September 2017. Senior Vice President, Gaming Systems, at Bally Technologies from December 2014 until September 2017. Senior Vice President, Bally Technologies, from April 2006 until December 2014.


Chris Robertson

51

Vice President, Corporate Controller and Treasurer, since June 2019.

Corporate Controller and Treasurer from June 2017 until June 2019. Corporate Controller from February 2017 until June 2017. Managing Director at Grant Thornton LLP from 2010 until January 2017.

Frank Pitsikalis

54

Vice President, Strategy, since January 2022.

Founder and Chief Executive Officer, ResortSuite from September 2000 until January 2022.

Sethuram Shivashankar

51

Chief Information Officer, since March 2022.

Senior Vice President, Gaming Systems, Scientific Games from October 2018 until April 2021. Senior Vice President, Technology, Scientific Games from October 2017 until October 2018. Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer, Gaming Systems, Scientific Games, from February 2016 until October 2017.

Terrie O'Hanlon

60

Chief Marketing Officer, since March 2022.

Chief Marketing Officer, GreyOrange from March 2019 until March 2022. Chief Marketing Officer, DefenseStorm from September 2017 until March 2019. Chief Marketing Officer, Steelwedge (now e20pen) from March 2015 to March 2017.


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


Introduction

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (the “CD&A”) describes our executive compensation philosophy and programs for our Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2017.2022, being the year beginning April 1, 2021, and continuing through March 31, 2022. Compensation arrangements with our Named Executive Officers are governed by the Compensation Committee of our board of directors.


Our Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 20172022 consisted of our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”)(CEO), our Interim Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”)(CFO), our former CEO, our former CFO, and our three other most highly compensated officers during fiscal year 2017,2022, as listed below:


Ramesh Srinivasan, President and CEO
James Dennedy, our former President and CEO
Tony Pritchett, Interim CFO and Treasurer
Janine Seebeck, our formerDave Wood, Senior Vice President CFO and TreasurerCFO
Kyle Badger, Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
Larry Steinberg,
Don DeMarinis, Senior Vice President Chief Technology OfficerSales, Americas and EMEA
Jimmie D. Walker, Jr., Senior
Chris Robertson, Vice President, Global Revenue

Our executive compensation programs in fiscal year 2017 were of several distinct types due to (1) the Compensation Committee’s focus on compensation for the CEOCorporate Controller and CFO at the beginning of the fiscal year, (2) the roles of the other individual Named Executive Officers, and (3) events that occurred during the fiscal year. Only three of our Named Executive Officers at the beginning of the fiscal year remained with us at the end of the fiscal year, one of which, as the head of our sales and marketing function, had a compensation plan that was significantly different from the other Named Executive Officers.

Former CEO and CFO. At the beginning of fiscal year 2017, our board of directors and Compensation Committee believed that the Company was not performing to its potential and that the total compensation of the Named Executive Officers was excessive compared to the performance of the Company. As a result, the Compensation Committee increased the emphasis placed on performance for our CEO and CFO by setting aggressive goals for their annual cash incentive and long-term incentive compensation based on a significant increase in the price of our common stock.

During the fiscal year, our board of directors determined that it would be in the best interests of our shareholders to replace the CEO to take advantage of the significant growth opportunities in front of us while further positioning the Company to achieve accelerated growth, and Mr. Srinivasan succeeded Mr. Dennedy as our President and CEO on January 3, 2017. In addition, Ms. Seebeck resigned as our CFO and was replaced by Mr. Pritchett on an interim basis from November 18, 2016, until the end of the fiscal year. He was subsequently appointed Vice President and CFO in June 2017.

Mr. Srinivasan. Mr. Srinivasan’s compensation during fiscal year 2017 was set in his Employment Agreement in connection with his hiring as CEO. Because he joined us toward the end of fiscal year 2017, his compensation for fiscal year 2017 included no incentives based on fiscal year 2017 performance.

Mr. Pritchett. Mr. Pritchett’s compensation during fiscal year 2017 was largely based on his service as Senior Director of Operations reporting to Ms. Seebeck prior to his appointment to Interim CFO, with only slight


15Treasurer



adjustments being made upon his appointment to Interim CFO, given the potential temporary nature of the interim role.

Messrs. Badger and Steinberg. Messrs. Badger and Steinberg were among the three Named Executive Officers at the beginning of the fiscal year to remain in their roles at the end of the fiscal year. Their compensation for fiscal year 2017 consisted of similar elements and adhered to the same philosophy and objectives.

Mr. Walker. Mr. Walker, the head of our sales and marketing function, also remained in his role for the entire fiscal year, but he had a compensation structure designed to incent profitable sales bookings growth, and in fiscal year 2017 it was therefore substantially different from that of the other Named Executive Officers.

Compensation Highlights

Former CEO and CFO

Compensation Focus for Fiscal Year 2017. At2022

As discussed last year, the beginningglobal spread and unprecedented impact of COVID-19 had a significant impact on our business, the hospitality industry and the global economy during our prior fiscal year, 2017, our board of directorsfiscal year 2021, and Compensation Committee believedin response to the pandemic, we took steps to reduce operating costs and improve efficiency, which included benefit limitations and decreases in salaries that the Company was not performing to its potential and that prior totalsubstantially reduced cash compensation offor the Named Executive Officers, and Mr. Dennedy and Ms. Seebeck,Officers. Although COVID-19 continued to have an impact on our former CEO and CFO respectively, in particular, was excessive compared to the performance of the Company. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee focused its attention for fiscal year 2017 executive compensation on revising the programs in place for the CEO and CFO.


The Compensation Committee determined that base salaries and target levels of annual cash incentive and long-term incentive for the CEO and CFO in fiscal year 2016 were adequate and appropriate for their roles, and no increase in base salary or target annual cash incentive or long-term incentive was approved for fiscal year 2017.

In fiscal year 2016, the CEO and CFO earned 138% of their target annual cash incentives for performance that the Committee believed was only modestly in excess of our plan. As a result, the Committee used its discretion to reduce the fiscal year 2016 annual cash incentive award to the CEO to 100% of target as explained in last year’s CD&A. For fiscal year 2017, the Committee desired to establish performance goals for the annual cash incentives of the CEO and CFO that were more directly related to increases in shareholder value and to reward more substantial improvement than prior compensation plans.

The Compensation Committee set the fiscal year 2017 performance goals for annual cash incentives for the CEO and CFO based on the achievement of a stock price target by March 31, 2017. The stock price performance goal would have been achieved if at any timebusiness during fiscal year 20172022, the closing stock price ofcompensation structure for our common stock on NASDAQ was greater than or equal to $14.00 per share for a period of at least thirty consecutive days. Achievement of the stock price performance goal would have earned each of the CEO and CFO a cash payment at the annual cash incentive target level, and no additional or incremental payment could have been earned for achievement of any higher or lower stock price. If the stock price performance goal was not achieved by April 1, 2017, then no annual incentive payment would have been earned. The CEO and CFO’s ability to earn the annual cash incentive ceased when their employment with us ended during the fiscal year. In any event, the stock price performance goal was not achieved by the end of the fiscal year.

Similarly, the Compensation Committee awarded long-term incentives to each of the CEO and CFO for fiscal year 2017 consisting of shares of restricted common stock which would vest based on the achievement of a stock price performance goal by March 31, 2018. The stock price performance goal would have been achieved if at any time during our 2017 and 2018 fiscal years, the closing stock price of our common stock on NASDAQ was greater than or equal to $17.00 per share for a period of at least thirty consecutive days. If the stock price performance goal was not achieved by April 1, 2018, then no performance shares would have been earned. The award provided that the restricted shares would be forfeit by the CEO and CFO if their employment with the Company terminated for any reason prior to achievement of the stock price performance goals, and accordingly, all shares were for forfeit by the CEO and CFO during the fiscal year when their employment with the Company terminated.

On January 7, 2017, the Company and Mr. Dennedy agreed on the terms of a separation agreement in lieu of the terms provided in Mr. Dennedy’s employment agreement with the Company. In exchange for waiving the severance


16



payments to which he is entitled under his employment agreement, Mr. Dennedy received a cash payment of $823,571. He did not receive any accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards.

Ms. Seebeck voluntarily terminated her employment with us on November 18, 2016, and did not receive any severance payment or accelerated vesting of outstanding equity awards.

New CEO Compensation. In connection with Mr. Srinivasan’s appointment as CEO, our board of directors approved, and the Company entered into, an employment agreement with him on December 6, 2016. In accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Srinivasan’s base salary is $600,000 per year, subject to annual review and adjustment by the Compensation Committee. The board of directors believed this base salary was the amount necessary to obtain a CEO with the talent and skills to take advantage of the significant growth opportunities in front of us while further positioning the Company to achieve accelerated growth.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Srinivasan was not eligible to earn annual incentives for performance in fiscal year 2017. On January 3, 2017, his first date of employment with us, Mr. Srinivasan received a grant of 630,000 stock settled appreciation rights (SSARs) at an exercise price equal to $10.80 the closing price of our common stock on January 3, 2017. One third of the SSAR grant vests on January 3, 2018, and the remainder vests in pro rata monthly portions thereafter over the next two years, provided that Mr. Srinivasan remains employed by us on each vesting date.

In addition, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Srinivasan is entitled to receive the Company’s current customary employee benefits and up to $20,000 in relocation benefits.

Interim CFO Compensation. Prior to his appointment as Interim CFO and Treasurer, Mr. Pritchett served as our Senior Director of Operations, a non-executive officer position, which position he held at the beginning of fiscal year 2017. His compensation for this position was not determined or reviewed by the Compensation Committee. Upon his appointment to Interim CFO during the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee approved an increase in his base salary to $200,000 from $167,000, for so long as he served as Interim CFO. Mr. Pritchett had an annual cash incentive target of $33,000 prior to his appointment, which he retained, and the Committee approved an additional $10,000 target annual cash incentive based on his service as Interim CFO. Mr. Pritchett received no additional long-term equity incentives in connection with his appointment as Interim CFO.

Mr. Pritchett earned $13,000 of his $33,000 annual bonus opportunity related to performance during fiscal year 2017 prior to his appointment as Interim CFO. The Compensation Committee awarded him 100% of his $10,000 bonus related to service as Interim CFO, which the Committee deemed to have been successful, as evidence by his being appointed Vice President and CFO in June 2017.

Compensation Focus for Fiscal Year 2017. The compensation arrangements with our other Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2017 were similar2022 largely returned to theirthe compensation arrangementsstructure for Named Executive Officers in fiscal year 2016years prior to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our CEO’s compensation included base salary and recent prior years. an annual incentive based on company financial performance that is settled in shares of common stock. The compensation for our other Named Executive Officers included base salary, annual cash incentives based on company financial performance, and long-term equity incentives.

After considering the results of our recent votes on Named Executive Officer compensation, which confirmed the Company’s general philosophy and objectives relative to our executive compensation program, the Compensation Committee continued to link executive pay to performance and maintained base salaries and annual incentive opportunities for the Named Executive Officers generally at the same level as fiscal year 2016, while focusing annual incentives2021. Annual incentive performance targets for fiscal year 2022 were focused on improvements over pre-pandemic fiscal year 20162020 results. The Compensation Committee also reducedannual incentive for our CEO, while based on the total value of long-termsame company financial measures as the annual incentives for the other Named Executive Officers, because these Named Executive Officers had received significant equity grantswas settled in recent years,shares of common stock to further align the CEO with shareholder interests and the reduced annual long-term incentive remained sufficient to create continued alignment with the interests of shareholders.


Performance Linked Compensation. Our Compensation Committee set fiscal year 2017 compensation, including financial targets for performance-based compensation, for our Named Executive Officers to continue to emphasize pay for performance by setting annual cash incentives goals based on improvements over fiscal year 2016 results.long term value creation.

Annual cash incentive goals for Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker included Company financial metrics – revenue, software as a service (SaaS) bookings, cash balance, and adjusted EBITDA – and individual performance


17



goals.

In fiscal year 2016, annual cash2022, the Compensation Committee did not provide additional long-term equity incentive goals forawards to all of the Named Executive Officers. The Committee believed that outstanding long-term equity incentive awards to most of the Named Executive Officers were based solely onsufficient to achieve the Company’s achievementgoals of revenueretention and adjusted EBITDA targets. For fiscal year 2017, the Compensation Committee desired to include additional financial targets to alignalignment with the Company’s strategy of increasing SaaS revenue and preserving cash through better management of expenses, as well as continuing to pursue growth in revenue and adjusted EBITDA. In addition,shareholder interests. Instead, the Committee added individual performance goals for thefocused additional long-term equity incentive awards on those Named Executive Officers whom it believed were disproportionately at risk of retention due to reward specific behaviors aligned with the Company’s strategy.


The targeted compensation of Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker was between 50% and 59% performance-based, tied directly to annual goals or long-term equity awards, the value of which is tied directly to an increase in share price.

Our operating results for fiscal year 2017 underperformed our plan. As a result, Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker earned between 32% and 74% of their target annual incentives related to fiscal year 2017.

tightening labor markets.

Compensation Philosophy, Objectives, and Structure


Our Compensation Committee adopted its pay philosophy, objectives, and structure for Named Executive Officers to achieve financial and business goals and create long-term shareholder value.


Compensation Philosophy and Objectives. For fiscal year 2017,2022, our Compensation Committee’s pay philosophy was to place more emphasis onemphasize performance-based compensation tied directly to annual goals orin the form of annual cash incentives and long-term performance-based compensation in the form of long-term equity awards, to link compensation to our business strategy, and to reduce total compensation.incentives. The Compensation Committee’s objective was to establish an overall compensation package to:

Reward the achievement of business objectives approved by our board of directors;
Tie a significant portion of compensation to the long-term performance of our common shares;
Provide a rational, consistent, and competitive executive compensation program that is well understood by those to whom it applies;
Tie a significant portion of compensation to the long-term performance of our common shares; and
Attract, retain, and motivate executives who cancould significantly contribute to our success.


Compensation Structure. Our compensation structure is comprised of:


Base Salary — Base salary provides fixed pay levels aimed to attract and retain executive talent. Variations in salary levels among Named Executive Officers are based on each executive’s roles and responsibilities, experience, functional expertise, relation to peer pay levels, competitive assessments, individual performance, and changes in salaries in the overall general market and for all employees of the Company. Salaries are reviewed annually by our Compensation Committee, and changes in salary are based on these factors and input from our CEO, other than for himself. None of the factors are weighted according to any specific formula. New salariesSalaries for new executive officers are generally are based on the Compensation Committee’s discretion and judgment but may be based on any of the above-mentioned relevant factors.


Annual Incentives — Annual incentives provide cash variable pay for achievement of the Company’s financial strategic, and operational goals and individual goals, with target incentives set as a percentage of salary, and are designed to reward achievement of goals with an annual cash payment. Variations in target incentive amounts among Named Executive Officers are determined by our Compensation Committee and based on market data, length of time in current role or similar role at another company, and recommendations from our CEO, other than for himself. At the end of each fiscal year, the Compensation Committee considers the aggregate compensation of each Named Executive Officer and adjustsmay adjust the annual incentive payment otherwise earned if the aggregate compensation is deemed deficient or excessive in the opinion and discretion of the Compensation Committee. Annual incentives are paid in cash except for our CEO, and his annual incentives are settled in shares of common stock.


Long-Term Incentives — Long-term incentives are variable, equity incentives designed to drive improvements in performance that build wealth and create long-term shareholder value by tying the value of earned incentives to the long-term performance of our common shares. Target long-term incentives are also set as a percentage of salary. Variations in awards among Named Executive Officers are determined by our Compensation Committee after a review of various



18



factors, including recommendations based on market data, individual ability to influence results, length of time in current role or similar role at another company, and recommendations from our CEO, other than for himself.

Compensation Key Considerations


Annual Goal Setting. Annual goals for our Named Executive Officers aremay be tied to our financial, strategic, and operational goals and may include business specific financial targets relating to our goals. For fiscal year 2017,2022, the Compensation Committee linked the annual incentive goals to financial targets emphasizing both growth and profitability. Annual incentives were based on revenue growth, but payment was conditioned upon the achievement of Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker to the same financial goals for revenue, SaaS Bookings, cash anda minimum adjusted EBITDA plus individual performance objectives. Mr. Pritchett’s annual incentives, although not set by the Compensation Committee, including the same financial goals. At fiscal year-end, the Compensation Committee evaluated the performanceand a minimum end of each Named Executive Officer, considered recommendations from our CEO and determined an appropriate award based on established goals.year cash balance.


Variable Pay at Risk. Our compensation philosophy drives the provision of greater at-risk pay to our Named Executive Officers, and variable pay at risk comprised between 50%33% and 59%61% of target annual compensation for Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker.the Named Executive Officers. Our Named Executive Officers have significant opportunities for long-term, equity-based incentive compensation, as our philosophy is to tie a significant portion of compensation to the long-term performance of our common shares. Thus, significant emphasis is placed on long-term shareholder value creation, thereby we believe minimizing excessive risk taking by our executives.


Compensation Consultants and Competitive Market Assessments. The Compensation Committee did not engage a compensation consultant and did not rely on any market assessment of compensation in setting compensation for fiscal year 2017.2022.


Tally Sheets. Our Compensation Committee analyzed tally sheets at the beginning and end of the fiscal year to review overall compensation and pay mix for each Named Executive Officer. Tally sheets included a three-year look-back of total compensation, including annual cash compensation, long-term incentive awards granted and earned, and benefits and perquisites. Tally sheets also included a cumulative inventory of equity grants by fiscal year, including the value of outstanding equity at the Company’s current stock price and the value received for prior vesting and exercises of equity. The tally sheets brought together, in one place, all elements of Named Executive Officers’ actual compensation and information about wealth accumulation so that our Compensation Committee could analyze the individual elements, the mix of compensation and the aggregate total amount of annual and accumulated compensation. Tally sheets were also used by the Compensation Committee to evaluate internal pay equity among the Named Executive Officers and to determine the impact of employment termination or change of control events. In support of the philosophy of rewarding performance, tally sheets are used by the Compensation Committee to review compensation as compared to expectations, and our Compensation Committee determined that annual compensation set for our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2017 was consistent with expectations and with the established compensation philosophy and pay mix guidelines driven by that philosophy.

Fiscal Year 20172022 Compensation


Base SalarySalary.

. For fiscal year 2017,2022, base salary comprised between 40%39% and 50%67% of total target compensation for Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker.the Named Executive Officers. Base salaries for the Named Executive Officers other than Messrs. Wood and Robertson did not change from fiscal year 20162021. The Compensation Committee and the CEO, with respect to 2017 for any of the Named Executive Officers because the Compensation Committeeother than himself, believed that the base salaries set in fiscal year 2016 to besalary of these Named Executive Officers were still aligned with the Committee’s philosophyphilosophies and goals.


In the third quarter of fiscal year 2022, the Compensation Committee increased Mr. Wood’s annual base salary from $240,000 to $275,000, and increased Mr. Robertson’s annual base salary from $231,750 to $245,000, because the Committee believed based on their own experience and judgement that as finance professionals, Messrs. Wood and Robertson were disproportionately subject to retention risk in a tight labor market and that retaining them in their financial leadership roles was important to provide stability to the Company’s finance and accounting teams.


Annual Incentives.

Annual IncentivesIncentive Targets. ForThe Compensation Committee set fiscal year 2017,2022 annual incentive goals were set at the beginning of the fiscal year with the belief that the Company’s financial results would no longer be significantly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic after the first half of the fiscal year. The discussion below provides details regarding fiscal year 2017As previously discussed, the Committee linked the annual incentive performance metrics, levels, and payouts forgoals of the Named Executive Officers.Officers to revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and cash balance. All the Named Executive Officers were subject to the same annual incentive structure:


Annual Incentive Levels. Fiscal year 2017
100% of target annual incentives were set asbased on the Company’s achievement of a percentagefiscal year 2022 revenue target of salary. Target$185 million;
provided that Adjusted EBITDA after payment of annual incentives forwas not less than $32 million;
provided, further, that the Company’s balance of cash and cash equivalents at the end of fiscal year 2017 were set2022 was at 50% of salary for Mr. Badger, 60% of salary for Mr. Steinberg and 122% of salary for Mr. Walker, substantiallyleast $85 million, as adjusted downward during the same as the prior fiscal years. Annual incentives comprised approximately 25% of total target compensation for each of Messrs. Badger and Steinberg and 50% for Mr. Walker. As head of our


19



global sales and marketing function, annual incentives tied to bookings and other sales goals comprise a more substantial portion of his compensation than for the other Named Executive Officers.

Performance Metrics for Badger and Steinberg. For fiscal year 2017, 65% ofin the total target annual incentiveCommittee’s discretion for each of Messrs. Badger and Steinberg was based on financial performance metrics. Financial performance metrics consisted of targets for revenue, SaaS bookings,$25 million in cash balance and adjusted EBITDA. Their total annual incentive was weighted 25% on achievement ofused in the revenue target, 20% onResortSuite acquisition.

Component

Weighting

(%)

Threshold

Target

Maximum

 

 

Amount

Payout (% of target incentive)

Amount

Payout (% of target incentive)

Amount

Payout (% of target incentive)

Revenue

100

$180M

50

$185M

100

$195M

150

Achievement would be scaled between the achievement of the SaaS bookings target, 10% on achievement of the cash balance target and 10% on achievement of the adjusted EBITDA target.


The Compensation Committee set revenue and adjusted EBITDA financial performance metrics for fiscal year 2017 to require meaningful improvements over fiscal year 2016 results. The targetthreshold level for revenue was set at a $14.2 million, or 12%, improvement over fiscal 2016 results; and the target level for adjusted EBITDA was set at a $6.1 million, or 242%, improvement over fiscal 2016 results. In addition, the Compensation Committee set target levels for SaaS bookings at $45,000 and target levels for fiscal year end cash balance at $56.6 million. These targets reflected the amount that the Compensation Committee believed could be reasonably achieved given the Company’s operating plan and the costs associated with the Company’s on-going investment in its next generation products and the Company’s strategy of increasing revenue from its subscription services products.

Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure, is calculated as income before income taxes, interest expense (net of interest income), depreciation and amortization (including amortization of developed technology), and excluding charges relating to (i) legal settlements, (ii) restructuring, severance, and other charges, (iii) asset write- offs and other fair value adjustments, (iv) share-based compensation, and (v) other non-operating (income) expense. The Company believes adjusted EBITDA is a profitability measure and a key driver of value, focusing on sales, product mix, margins, and expense management. Adjusted EBITDA was selected as an annual goal component given the desire to balance sales and margins, as both are manageable by our Named Executive Officers.

Performance percentages for payouts (with proportionate payouts between the target level and the maximum achievement levels) were based on varying levels of achievement of fiscal year 2017 results, as described below. No payment was earned at less than target performance, and payoutslevel. Payouts were capped at 120%150% of target incentives.




Component


Weighting
(%)
TargetMaximum


Amount
Payout (% of target incentive)


Amount
Payout (% of target incentive)
Revenue25$134.6M100$14M120
Adjusted EBITDA20$10.4M100$11.5M120
SaaS Bookings10$0.045M100$0.060M120
Cash Balance10$56.6M100$60.6M120

If either the Adjusted EBITDA or cash balance conditions were not achieved, then the annual incentives would not be earned. The Committee also allowed for up to 50% achievement, in their discretion, if the threshold level of revenue was not met, provided that the Adjusted EBITDA condition was met.

For fiscal year 2022, the Committee continued to believe that revenue growth was most accretive to shareholder value. The Committee imposed the Adjusted EBITDA and cash balance conditions in order to encourage disciplined management of Company expenses and profitable growth.

Given the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the hospitality industry and our business during the prior fiscal year, the Compensation Committee believed that the plan involved performance that was extraordinarily difficult at the 100% target levels.

Annual Incentive Results. Total revenue increased $25.4 million, or 19%, in fiscal 2022 compared to fiscal 2021. Fiscal year 2022 revenue was a record $162.6 million,compared to $137.2 in fiscal year 2021 and $160.6 million in fiscal year 2020. The attained revenue was well below the $180 million threshold level givenfor annual incentive achievement. Notwithstanding the failure to achieve the threshold revenue target, the Committee believed the Company had exceeded expectations with respect to growing Adjusted EBITDA and cash balance despite the continuing transformationchallenges of the business and competition and pricing pressure in the market, and



20



significantly difficult at the maximum level, requiring meaningful improvementCOVID-19 pandemic. Adjusted EBITDA improved 2% over fiscal year 20162021, and cash balance grew 48% over fiscal year 2021, and both metrics represented a more than 100% improvement over the results of fiscal year 2020. Accordingly, the Committee used its discretion to certify 34% achievement of annual incentive targets, which was the amount the Committee believed was both reasonable and would not significantly impact the Company’s profitability and cash balance goals.

Component

Result

Target

Achievement

Revenue

$162.6 M

$185.0 M

34%

Adjusted EBITDA

$27.3 M

$32.0 M

34%

Cash Balance

$97.0 M

$110.0 M

34%

CEO Annual Incentive. Mr. Srinivasan was eligible for revenuean annual incentive for fiscal year 2022 based on the Company financial performance metrics described above, with any such earned incentive to be settled in shares of common stock. Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Srinivasan’s target annual incentive for fiscal year 2022 was set at 100% of his base salary, or $600,000, with a maximum potential incentive of $900,000 (150% of his base salary), payable upon achievement of 150% of the annual incentive goals, and adjusted EBITDA,a threshold potential incentive of $300,000 (50% of his target annual incentive), payable upon achievement of 50% of the annual incentive goals.

Based on the fiscal year 2022 results discussed above, Mr. Srinivasan was awarded 34%, or $204,000, of his annual incentive target. Accordingly, the Compensation Committee granted Mr. Srinivasan 5,384 shares of common stock, being the number of shares having a value of $204,000 based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on May 24, 2022, the date that the Committee made its determination.


Annual Incentives for the Other Named Executive Officers. Fiscal year 2022 target annual incentives for the other Named Executive Officers other than Mr. DeMarinis, were set as 50% of the executive’s base salary. Mr. DeMarinis’ annual incentive was set as 60% of his base salary, and he was also eligible for target annual incentives of $150,000 for sales-related incentives due to his role as head of our Americas and EMEA Sales teams.

Annual incentives comprised 19% to 55% of total fiscal year 2022 target compensation for these Named Executive Officers. The Compensation Committee set the annual incentives for Mr. Wood at 50% of his base salary, and his target annual incentives for fiscal year 2022 represents a pro-rated amount based on the increase in each case relativehis base salary in December 2021. The Committee increased the annual incentives for Mr. Robertson from 35% of his base salary to future expectations at50% of his base salary in December 2021, and his target annual incentives for fiscal year 2022 represents a pro-rated amount based on the timeincrease in his base salary and the levels were set.


increase in his target annual incentive as a percentage of base salary.

Officer

Target Annual Incentive as % of Base Salary

Target Annual Incentives ($)

Target Annual Incentive as % of FY22 Total Target Compensation

Dave Wood

50%

  125,833

19%

Kyle Badger

50%

  140,000

33%

Don DeMarinis

120%

  300,000

55%

Chris Robertson

50%

  94,719

40%

Additional detail about target and maximum incentives are disclosed in the Grants of Plan-Based Awards for

Fiscal Year 2017 table.

Performance Metrics for Walker. Mr. Walker’s2022 table below.

Based on the fiscal year 2017 annual incentives consisted2022 results discussed above, each of commissions earned for achieving gross margin quotas for bookings (i.e., dollar value of gross margin for sales booked), for which his target incentive was $200,750. Our CEO set the target bookings levels at those he believed necessary for the Company to successfully execute the operating plan. There was no floor or ceiling on the amount that Mr. Walker could earn with respect to these performance metrics.


MBOs. In addition to objective financial performance metrics, management by objective goals (“MBOs”) comprised 35% of the annual incentive of Messrs. Badger and Steinberg and 27% for Mr. Walker. MBOs represent individual performance-based goals, with both quantitative and qualitative measures, relative to individual responsibilities and emphasize the importance of specific tasks and company-wide initiatives. The Compensation Committee believed that MBOs were appropriate for executives whose impact on shareholder value was less direct than the CEO and CFO. The Compensation Committee had discretion in deciding whether each MBO was achieved and in determining the level of achievement, and thus payout, for the MBO components. Achievement of MBOs results in a payout up to 100% for maximum achievement, and Named Executive Officers are eligible for proportionate payouts up to the maximum achievement levels. Consistent with the other elements of compensation, MBOs were established at the beginning of year when the outcome for the fiscal year was substantially uncertain. Fiscal year 2017 MBO goals and payout allocations for the Name Executive Officers were as follows:


Executive
MBO% of Annual Incentives
Kyle BadgerBookings with 3 strategic accounts35
Larry SteinbergBookings with 3 strategic accounts11.7
Achieve engineering delivery schedule and product launch revenue11.7
Achieve rGuest Stay bookings greater than $2.5m11.7
Jimmie WalkerBookings with 3 strategic accounts13.5
Achieve rGuest Stay bookings greater than $2.5m3.6
Achieve Sales & Marketing operating expense target9.9

Fiscal Year 2017 Payouts. Our operating results for fiscal year 2017 underperformed our plan. As a result, our Messrs. Badger and Steinberg earned only 33%awarded 34% of their target annual incentives relatedsubject to financial targets for fiscal year 2017, andthe annual incentive plan described above. Mr. WalkerDeMarinis earned 76%an additional $103,796 of his target annual$150,000 sales incentives related to achieving gross margin quotas for bookings.

The chart below sets forth the fiscal year 2017 annual incentive opportunity for each of Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker and the actual annual incentive awards earned and paid(69%) based on the Compensation Committee’s reviewnet gross profit of eligible sales.

Officer

Annual Incentive Plan Target ($)

Achievement (%)

Annual Incentive Plan Payout ($)

Annual Sales Incentive Payout ($)

Total Annual Incentives Payouts ($)

Dave Wood

  125,833

34

  42,783

  —

  42,783

Kyle Badger

  140,000

34

  47,600

  —

  47,600

Don DeMarinis

  300,000

34

  51,000

  103,796

  154,796

Chris Robertson

  94,719

34

  32,205

  —

  32,205

Long-Term Incentives.

In the achievement of the performance measures.




21



OfficerTotal Annual Incentive
ComponentWeight
Incentive Payment at Target
% Achieved
Payment
Kyle C. Badger
$130,000
Revenue25%$32,500
0%-
  SaaS Bookings20%$26,000
106%$27,560
  Cash10%$13,000
0%-
  Adjusted EBITDA10%$13,000
0%-
  MBO – Bookings with 3 strategic accounts35%$45,500
67%$30,333
    $130,000
45%
$57,893
       
Larry Steinberg
$157,500
Revenue25%$39,375
0%-
  SaaS Bookings20%$31,500
106%$33,390
  Cash10%$15,750
0%-
  Adjusted EBITDA10%$15,750
0%-
  MBO – Bookings with 3 strategic accounts11.7%$18,375
67%$12,243
  
MBO - Delivery schedule and launch revenue
11.7%$18,375
25%
$4,591
  
MBO - rGuest Stay bookings greater than $2.5m
11.7%$18,375
0%-
    $157,500
32%
$50,224
       
Jim Walker
$275,000
Bookings Quota73%$200,750
76%$152,327
  MBO – Bookings with 3 strategic accounts13.5%$37,125
67%$24,750
  
MBO - rGuest Stay bookings greater than $2.5m
3.6%$10,000
0%-
  
MBO – Sales & Marketing opex target
9.9%$27,125
100%$27,125
    $275,000
74%
$204,202

Long-Term Incentives. As with the annual incentives,prior fiscal year, fiscal year 2021, the Compensation Committee approved fiscal year 2017increased the value of long-term incentive (“LTI”) awards to all participants, including each of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Srinivasan, compared to recent prior years, to bolster retention at a time when it appeared that the hospitality industry and the Company would be disproportionately impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. At the beginning of year when the outcome for the fiscal year was substantially uncertain.2022, the Compensation Committee determined not to provide any further LTI awards to the Named Executive Officers consistedfor fiscal year 2022 since they believed the awards made in fiscal year 2021 and prior years were sufficient to achieve the goals of stock-settled appreciation rightsretention and alignment with shareholder interests without additional awards. Mr. Srinivasan did not receive any long-term equity incentive awards in fiscal years 2022 and 2021 since he received a large award upon the renewal of his employment agreement at the end of fiscal year 2020.

In December 2021, at the time that the Committee increased their annual base salaries, the Committee approved additional LTI awards to Messrs. Wood and Robertson to bolster their retention.

In setting LTI awards for Messrs. Wood and Robertson, the Committee received input and recommendations from our CEO. The Committee set LTI awards for Mr. Wood at 100% of his increased base salary, with the value of 50% of his base salary being allocated to restricted common stock vesting over three years (“SSARs”Time-Vesting Restricted Shares”), and the value of 50% of his base salary being allocated to restricted shares subject to both a three year vesting period and the closing price of the Company’s common stock attaining $85 per share for ten consecutive trading days at any time prior to the close of trading on November 30, 2024 (“Performance-Vesting Shares”). The Committee set LTI awards for Mr. Robertson at 50% of his increased base salary, with the value of 25% of his base salary being allocated to Time-Vesting Restricted Shares and the value of 25% of his base salary being allocated to Performance-Vesting Shares.


Awards of Time-Vesting Restricted Shares were based on the closing price of our common stock on December 1, 2021, the date the Committee granted the awards, which was $43.02 per share. Awards of Performance-Vesting Shares were based on the Lattice option pricing model that utilizes a binomial tree to forecast pricing as of December 1, 2021, which was $24.77 per share.

Officer

LTI Award

LTI Value ($)*

Shares Subject to Award (#)

Dave Wood

Restricted Stock

  137,500

  3,196

 

Performance RSAs

  137,500

  5,551

Chris Robertson

Restricted Stock

  61,250

  1,423

 

Performance RSAs

  61,250

  2,472

LTI awards comprised 42% and 27% of total fiscal year 2022 target compensation for Messrs. Wood and Robertson, respectively.

The majority of the LTI awards vest in the last year of the three-year vesting schedules, pursuantperiod. The Time-Vesting Restricted Shares vest 25% on November 30, 2022, 25% on November 30, 2023, and 50% on November 30, 2024. The Performance-Vesting Shares vest 10% on November 30, 2022, 20% on November 30, 2023, and 70% on November 30, 2024, provided that the closing price of our common stock must have averaged at least $85 per share over a 10 consecutive trading day period at any time prior to November 30, 2024. If the Company’s shareholder-approved 2011 and 2016 Stock Incentive Plans. share price threshold is not achieved by the close of trading on November 30, 2024, the Performance-Vesting shares will be forfeited.

The Compensation Committee considered various LTI award alternatives. While annual incentives targeted specific performance goals, theCommittee’s focus onwith LTI awards washas been to link compensation directly to shareholder gains. SSARs providedThe Committee believed the direct link between compensation$85 target share price to be appropriate since it would be a significant increase over the Company’s then current share price of $43.02 and would represent a significant gain in shareholder gains in a less dilutive manner than with stock options, and the three-year vesting schedule also enhances retention.value if achieved. In addition, restricted shares tie compensation to shareholder gains andthe Committee believed the time-vesting schedule for the LTI awards highly bolster retention over the three-year vesting period. As in prior years, LTI awards were granted 50% as restricted stock and 50% as SSARs for each Named Executive Officer.


LTI awards comprised between 10% and 35% of total target compensation for Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker. In setting LTI awards for the Named Executive Officers other than the CEO, the Compensation Committee received input and recommendations from our CEO regarding each Named Executive Officer’s relative ability to influence results.

The Compensation Committee set the annual 2017 LTI awards for each Named Executive Officer as follows:


Name
Percent of
Salary (%)
Total LTI Value
($)
SSARs Granted
(#)
Restricted Shares
Granted (#)
Kyle Badger52133,99917,5986,399
Larry Steinberg86225,78229,65210,782
Jimmie Walker2555,2577,2572,638



22



All SSARs and restricted shares vest in one-third increments on March 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019. The SSARs were granted at an exercise price of $10.47 (the closing price of the common shares on the grant date), have a seven-year term, and are settled in common shares upon exercise.

Retention Grants – In connection with the CEO succession during the fiscal year, the Compensation Committee awarded retention grants to key employees of the Company, including Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker. The Committee believed such grants were necessary to retain these executives through the CEO succession.

The retention grants consisted of cash and equity awards as follows:

NameCash Retention AwardRestricted Shares Retention Award
Kyle Badger
20,000 shares
Larry Steinberg
$350,000
35,000 shares
Jimmie Walker
70,000 shares

The cash award and half of the restricted stock awards to Messrs. Badger and Walker will vest 100% on October 25, 2017, if the grantee remains employed by us on that date, or 100% if the Company terminates the grantee’s employment without cause. In the event of a change of control of the Company, the cash award and half of the restricted stock awards to Messrs. Badger and Walker will vest but will be subject to an additional one-year holding period. In accordance with our standard vesting terms for equity grants, the cash award and half of the restricted stock awards to Messrs. Badger and Walker will be forfeited in the event of voluntary termination of employment by the grantee, death or disability of the grantee, or termination for cause by the Company.

The restricted stock award to Mr. Steinberg and the other half of the restricted stock awards to Messrs. Badger and Walker will vest 100% on November 15, 2018, if the grantee remains employed by us on that date. In the event of a change of control of the Company prior to November 15, 2017, these shares will be forfeited; if a change of control occurs after November 15, 2017, these shares will vest but will be subject to an additional one-year holding period. In accordance with our standard vesting terms for equity grants, these shares will be forfeited in the event of voluntary termination of employment by the grantee, death or disability of the grantee, or termination with or without cause by the Company.

Additional Compensation – Executive Benefits. We provide executive benefits to our Named Executive Officers including additional life and long-term disability insurance plans. From time to time, Named Executive Officers also may participate in supplier sponsored events. Executive benefits are further described in the Summary Compensation Table. We believe these benefits enhance the competitiveness of our overall executive compensation package. We have, however, limited executive benefits offered to reduce compensation costs. Additionally, welfare benefits offered to our Named Executive Officers are the same level of benefits offered to all Company employees.


Employment Agreements and Change of Control


The material termination and change of control provisions of various agreements are summarized below for each Named Executive Officer and are covered in more detail in the Termination and Change of Control table and accompanying discussion.


Employment Agreements. In fiscal year 2015, Messrs. Badger, Pritchett and SteinbergThe Company has entered into employment agreements with each of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Robertson.

In accordance with his employment agreement, Mr. Srinivasan will serve as CEO and President for a three-year initial term beginning on January 1, 2020. The term of employment will automatically extend for successive periods of one year unless either the Company or Mr. Srinivasan provides written notice of non-renewal at least 90 days before the end of the then-current employment term. If the employment agreement is terminated by the Company without cause or by Mr. Srinivasan for good reason, then subject to his execution of a release of claims, Mr. Srinivasan will be entitled to receive severance equal to two years’ then-current base salary and two times the value of his target annual bonus performance shares, which will be paid during regular pay intervals over the course of two years. In addition, he will also receive (a) a lump sum payment in cash, on the 60th day after the termination date, equal to the total after-tax premiums required to pay for 24 months of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s medical, dental and vision insurance plans; (b) a lump sum payment in cash of his pro-rated bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance with substantiallyno negative discretion by the same terms.Board; and (c) twelve (12) months of accelerated vesting of all equity compensation awards that are subject to time or service-based vesting and were unvested and outstanding on the termination date. However, if notice of non-renewal is given within the last 12 months of the initial three-year employment term severance will only be paid for a 12-month period. If such termination occurs within three months before or 24 months after a change in control, Mr. WalkerSrinivasan will receive two times the sum of his then-current base salary and target annual bonus, two times the COBRA payment and 100% release of any post-closing restrictions related to equity awards that were deemed vested as a result of the change of control. In addition, upon any termination of employment, Mr. Srinivasan will receive accrued but unpaid base salary and payment for any unused vacation and unreimbursed expenses.

The Company entered into a substantially similar employment agreement in connectionagreements with his promotion to Senior Vice President in January 2016. Alleach of the employment agreements, exceptother Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Pritchett’s, have terms expiring August 1, 2017. Mr. Pritchett’s agreement expires October 31, 2017.Robertson on July 27, 2020. Under the employment agreements of Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker,for these Named Executive Officers, upon termination without cause, we must pay


severance equal to one year’s12 months’ salary and target annual incentive and a lump sum amount equal toreimbursement of the executive’s total premium for one year of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s health benefit plans. Under Mr. Pritchett’s employment agreement, upon termination without cause, we



23



must pay severance equal to six month’s salary and target annual incentive and a lump sum amount equal to the executive’s total premium for one year12 months of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s health benefit plans. If the executive’s positioncompensation is changed suchreduced by more than 10%, other than a general reduction that hisaffects all similarly situated executives, or her responsibilities are substantially lessened (a “changeif at any time prior to a change in position”),control the executive no longer reports to the CEO, the executive may terminate his or her employment if the Company fails to materially cure such condition within 30 days following notice of such condition by the executive, and the termination will be deemed to be a termination without cause and the executive is entitled to his or her severance benefits. None of the Named Executive Officers with employment agreements is entitled to excise tax gross-up payments. In consideration of the severance benefits, each employment agreement contains a 12-month post-termination non-solicitation provision, an indefinite confidentiality provision, and a 12- month post-termination non-compete provision. In the event that any of these Named Executive Officers are terminated without cause or by the executive for a change of positiongood reason in the 24 months following a change of control of the Company, Messrs. Badger, Steinberg and Walker arethe executive is entitled to severance pay equal to two year’s12 months’ salary and a pro rata portion of target annual incentive and a lump sum amount equal toreimbursement of the executive’s total premium for one year12 months of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s health benefit, and Mr. Pritchettbenefit. None of the Named Executive Officers is entitled to excise tax gross-up payments.

In consideration of the severance pay equalbenefits, Mr. Srinivasan is subject to one year’s salary24-month post-termination confidentiality and target annual incentivenon-disclosure requirements, as well as non-competition and non-solicitation obligations, except that if the term of his employment agreement expires at the end of the initial three-year term, the non-competition provisions will only apply for 12 months following termination. Each other employment agreement contains a 12-month post-termination non-solicitation provision, an indefinite confidentiality provision, and a lump sum amount equal to the executive’s total premium for one year of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s health benefit.


12-month post-termination non-compete provision.

Our Compensation Committee believes that the terms of these employment agreements enhance our ability to retain our executives and contain severance costs by providing reasonable severance benefits competitive with market practice. Severance costs are contained by limiting pay to one year in the absence of a change of control, limiting personal benefits, not providing accelerated vesting for awards under the agreements, and narrowly defining a voluntary termination that triggers severance benefits. Severance payments in the event of a change of control are subject to a double trigger such that severance benefits are provided only upon a combination of a change of control and a qualified termination. Additionally, the Company benefits greatly from the non-competition, non-disclosure, and non-solicitation clauses contained in the employment agreements.


Accelerated Vesting. NoneExcept as described above for our CEO, none of the employment agreements discussed above provide for accelerated vesting of equity. Under our 20112020 and 2016 Stock Incentive Plans, vesting is accelerated upon the actual occurrence of a change of control for all SSARs and restricted shares (including performance shares). The Compensation Committee believed that during a change of control situation, a stable business environment is in the shareholders’ best interests, and accelerated vesting provisions provide stability. The accelerated vesting provisions are applicable to all employees who receive equity awards, not just executive management.


The long-termequity incentive awards granted for fiscal year 2017to the Named Executive Officers are subject to a holding period of one year following a change of control. Under this provision, all unvested SSARs and restricted shares granted for fiscal year 2017 accelerate upon the actual occurrence of a change of control but remain subject to restrictions on exercise and transfer until the earlier of one year after the change of control or the executive’s termination of employment without cause.qualified termination. The Compensation Committee believed that this further restriction during a change of control situation further promotes a stable business environment and is in the shareholders’ best interests.


CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

The following is a reasonable estimate, prepared under applicable SEC rules, of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of our other employees. We determined our median employee in 2020 based on base salary (annualized in the case of full- and part-time employees who joined the company during fiscal year 2020) of each of our employees (excluding the CEO), as of March 31, 2020. The annual total compensation of our median employee (other than the CEO) for 2022 was $35,226. As disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table appearing on page 26, our CEO’s annual total compensation for fiscal year 2022 was $822,789. Based on the foregoing, our estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was 23 to 1. Given the different methodologies that various public companies will use to determine an estimate of their pay ratio, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies.

Additional Compensation Policies


Clawback – Recoupment of Bonuses, Incentives, and Gains. Under the Company’s “clawback” policy, if the board of directors determines that our financial statements are restated due directly or indirectly to fraud, ethical misconduct, intentional misconduct, or a breach of fiduciary duty by one or more executive officers or vice presidents, then the board of directors will have the sole discretion to cancel any stock-based awards granted and to take such action, as permitted by law, as it deems necessary to recover all or a portion of any bonus or incentive compensation paid and recoup any gains realized in respect of equity-based awards, provided recoveries cannot extend back more than three years. Additionally, under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, if we are required to restate our financial statements due to material noncompliance with any financial reporting requirements as a result of misconduct, our CEO and CFO must reimburse us for any bonus or other incentive-based or equity-based compensation received during the 12 months following


the first public issuance of the non-complying document, and any profits realized from the sale of our securities during those 12 months.




24



Stock Ownership Guidelines. To underscore the importance of strong alignment between the interests of management and shareholders, the board of directors approved stock ownership guidelines for directors and executives, with our CEO and directors having the highest ownership requirement.requirements. Director and executive compensation isare designed to provide a significant opportunity to tie individual rewards to long-term Company performance. The objective of our stock ownership guidelines is to support this overall philosophy of alignment and to send a positive message to our shareholders, customers, suppliers, and employees of our commitment to shareholder value. Each director and executive officer is expected to maintain minimum share ownership of either: (i) the number of shares with a value based on a multiple of base salary or director annual retainer listed below, or (ii) the number of shares listed below:


Title
Multiple of Director  
Annual Retainer and
Executive Base Salary
Number of Shares
2 Years4 Years2 Years4 Years
Director3x6x15,000 45,000 
CEO2.5x5x125,000 250,000 
Senior Vice President0.5x2x15,000 75,000 
LTIP Participants0.5x2,500 15,000 

Multiple of Director
Annual Retainer and
Executive Base Salary

2 Years

4 Years

Directors

3x

6x

CEO

3x

6x

Other Executive Officers

1.5x

3x

Stock ownership that is included toward attainment of the guidelines includes (i) shares owned directly (including through open market purchases, through the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan or acquired and held upon vesting of record or beneficiallyCompany equity awards); (ii) shares owned either directlyjointly with, or indirectly; (ii)separately by, his or her immediate family members residing in the same household; (iii) shares acquired upon exerciseheld in trust for the benefit of the individual, or his or her immediate family members; and (iv) in-the-money value of vested but unexercised stock options or SSARs;

(iii) vested restricted or deferred shares; (iv) phantom or deferred share units held in a deferred compensation plan; and (v) shares or deferred shares acquired by dividend reinvestment. stock appreciation rights.

Directors and executives are expected to attain the specified target ownership levels within both two and four years from the later of the effective date of this policy or becoming a director or an executive and remain at or above that level until retirement. Annually,The Compensation Committee of the board of directors regularly reviews progress toward achieving these ownership levels. Directorlevels, and at its meeting in May 2021, the Compensation Committee determined that all of the directors and executives who have not attainedmet the specifiedprescribed ownership guidelines will be required to hold 75% of shares acquired upon exercise of stock options and SSARs or vesting of performance or restricted shares until they meet their target ownership level. If ownership guidelines are not met within two and four years, our Compensation Committee has the right to pay an executive’s annual incentives in shares until ownership guidelines are achieved.


Stock Retention Policylevels.. Under the Company’s stock retention policy, directors and executive officers are required to hold shares of Company stock for at least one year after such shares vest in the case of performance or restricted shares, or one year after exercise in the case of stock options or SSARs, or until the earlier date of their termination of service as

Until a director or executive officer. The holding period policy does nothas satisfied the stock ownership guidelines, such director or executive is required to retain fifty percent (50%) of the net shares of common stock received from the Company as compensation after deducting any shares withheld by the Company or sold by the director or executive, if any, for the purpose of satisfying the exercise price and tax liabilities and related fees related to the settlement event. Once an individual achieves his or her stock ownership goal, these retention restrictions no longer will apply in instances ofunless a “change in control,” as defined indisposition would cause the 2016 Stock Incentive Plan.


individual's stock ownership to fall below his or her goal.

Impact of Tax and Accounting Considerations. In general, the Compensation Committee considers the various tax and accounting implications of the pay mechanisms used to provide pay to our Named Executive Officers, including the accounting cost associated with long-term incentive grants, when determining compensation. Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, generally prohibits any publicly held corporation from taking a federal incomethrough December 31, 2017, limited the tax deduction of public companies for paycompensation in excess of $1.0 million paid to the chief executive officertheir CEO and the three other highestmost highly compensated executive officers (other than the chief financial officer)CFO) at the end of any fiscal year unless the compensation qualified as “performance-based compensation” Under applicable IRS regulations. For tax years after December 31, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 amended Section 162(m) to expand the $1.0 million deduction limitation described above to a larger group of employees and to eliminate the “performance-based” exception. The employees (referred to as “covered employees”) to whom the deduction limitation applies include the CEO and CFO (in each case, whether or not serving as executive officers as of the end of the fiscal year) and the three other most highly compensated executive officers. In addition, once considered a “covered employee” for a given year, the individual will be treated as a “covered employee” for all subsequent years.

The Compensation Committee has considered the effect of Section 162(m) on the Company’s executive compensation program. The Compensation Committee exercises discretion in excesssetting base salaries, structuring incentive and long-term compensation awards and in determining payments in relation to levels of $1 million in any taxable year. Exceptions are madeachievement of performance goals. The Compensation Committee believes that the total compensation program for certain qualified performance-based pay. It is the Compensation Committee’s objective to maximize the effectiveness of our executive pay plans in this regard. The pay instruments used, including salaries, annual incentives, and equity, are tax deductible to the extent that they are performance-based or less than $1 million for such Named Executive OfficerOfficers should be managed in a given year. However,accordance with the Compensation Committee retains discretion to payobjectives outlined in the Committee’s compensation that isphilosophy and in the best overall interests of the Company’s shareholders. Accordingly, compensation paid by the Company may not taxbe deductible in situations where it believesbecause such compensation is appropriate.



exceeds the limitations for deductibility under Section 162(m).


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT




25



The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with the Company’s management. Based on that review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be includedincorporated in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20172022, and included in the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 20172022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.


The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors

Melvin Keating, Chairman

Michael A. Kaufman Keith M. Kolerus

Jerry Jones

John Mutch





26







EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


Summary Compensation Table

The following table and related notes provide information regarding fiscal year 20172022 compensation for our Named Executive Officers, including our CEO and CFO, former CEO and CFO,CFOs, and the other three most highly compensated executive officers whose total compensation exceeded $100,000 for fiscal year 2017.


2022.

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal Year 2017


Name and Principal PositionYear
Salary
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock Awards
($)(1)
Option Awards
($)(1)
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-sation
($)(2)
Non-
qualified
Deferred
Compen-
sation
Earnings
($)
All
Other
Compen-
sation
($)(3)
Total
($)
Ramesh Srinivasan
President and Chief Executive Officer
FY17147,692 
 
 2,317,807
 
   1,615 2,467,114 
                  
James H. Dennedy
President and Chief Executive Officer
FY17336,598 
 
 
 
   835,901 1,172,499 
FY16412,000 
 411,996
 411,999
 360,500
   30,071 1,626,566 
FY15410,154 
 1,087,491
 411,995
 
   33,919 1,943,559 
          
Tony Pritchett
Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
FY17186,152 
 113,517
  22,922
   8,139 330,730 
          
Janine K. Seebeck
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
FY17171,635 
 
 
 
   9,708 181,343 
FY16255,000 
 118,569
 118,574
 176,053
   10,074 678,270 
FY15252,692 
 507,291
 101,997
 
   11,533 873,513 
                  
Kyle C. Badger
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary
FY17260,000 
 267,557
 66,998
 57,893
   14,156 666,604 
FY16260,000 
 110,498
 110,497
 179,505
   11,425 671,925 
FY15260,000 
 441,747
 103,997
 
   12,497 818,241 
          
Larry Steinberg
Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer
FY17262,500 
 457,050
 112,889
 50,224
   14,209 896,872 
FY16262,500 
 190,307
 190,309
 217,477
   10,686 871,279 
FY15260,577 
 643,470
 170,623
 
   14,250 1,088,920 
          
Jimmie Walker, Jr.
Senior Vice President, Global Revenue
FY17225,000 
 721,675
 27,628
 204,222
   8,624 1,187,149 
FY16205,577 
 268,746
 42,860
 380,787
   9,994 907,964 
          

2022

Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary ($)

Bonus ($)(1)

Stock Awards ($)(2)

Option Awards ($)(2)

Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)(3)

All Other Compensation ($)(4)

Total ($)

Ramesh Srinivasan

FY22

  600,000

  —

  204,000

  —

  —

  18,789

  822,789

President and Chief Executive

FY21

  163,846

  —

  180,000

  —

  —

  4,601

  348,447

Officer

FY20

  600,000

  —

  450,000

  6,277,246

  —

  24,888

  7,352,134

Dave Wood

FY22

  251,173

  42,783

  275,000

  —

  —

  9,735

  578,691

Vice President and Chief Financial

FY21

  202,133

  36,000

  118,831

  1,144,574

  —

  2,996

  1,504,534

Officer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kyle Badger

FY22

  280,000

  47,600

  —

  —

  —

  14,549

  342,149

Senior Vice President, General

FY21

  238,000

  42,000

  138,616

  1,335,350

  —

  5,007

  1,758,973

Counsel and Secretary

FY20

  280,000

  —

  69,986

  69,995

  47,600

  29,172

  496,753

Don DeMarinis

FY22

  250,000

  32,205

  —

  —

  —

  12,776

  294,981

Senior Vice President Sales,

FY21

  212,500

  120,350

  123,290

  1,192,290

  —

  2,389

  1,650,819

Americas

FY20

  250,000

  11,679

  90,492

  62,494

  42,500

  27,466

  484,631

Chris Robertson

FY22

  234,215

  32,205

  122,500

  —

  —

  11,251

  400,171

Vice President, Corporate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Controller and Treasurer

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)
For fiscal year 2022, amounts include discretionary cash incentive payments awarded to the Named Executive Officers as described in the CD&A above. For Mr. DeMarinis, amounts also include commission and other sales-related incentives.
(2)
Stock Awards include grants of restricted shares and performance shares. Option Awards include SSAR grants. Amounts disclosed do not represent the economic value received by the Named Executive Officers. The value, if any, recognized upon the exercise of a SSAR will depend upon the market price of the shares on the date the SSAR is exercised. The value, if any, recognized for restricted and performance shares will depend upon the market price of the shares upon vesting. In accordance with SEC rules, the values for restricted and performance shares and SSARs are equal to the aggregate grant date fair value for each award computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The values for restricted and performance shares are based on the closing price on the grant date. TheFor Mr. Srinivasan, $stock awards consisted of shares of common stock awarded based on the achievement of performance conditions. In fiscal year 2020, the amount recorded above is based on the probable outcome of the performance conditions on the date of grant, and Mr. Srinivasan was actually granted shares worth $114,750. For the other Named Executive Officers, the values for SSARs are based on the Black-Scholes option pricing model. A discussionmodel for time-vesting SSARs and the Lattice option pricing model that utilizes a binomial tree to forecast option pricing for performance SSARs, as described in the CD&A above. Discussion of the assumptions used in determining these valuations is set forth in Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company’s 20172022 Annual Report. For Stock Awards, the amounts shown represent grants of restricted shares to each Named Executive Officer as part of the executive'sexecutive’s annual long-term


27


equity grant.

(3)
equity grant, and for 2015 and 2017 includes grants of restricted shares to improve retention of key management, including the Named Executive Officers.
(2)Amounts represent annual incentive payments received for 2017, 2016 and 20152020 based on pre-set incentive goals established at the beginning of each fiscal year and tied to the Company’s financial, strategic, and operational goals.
(3)(4)
All other compensation includes the following compensation, calculated based on the aggregate incremental cost to the Company of the benefits noted:

All Other Compensation for Fiscal Year 2017


Name
401(k)
Company
Match ($)
 
Executive
Life
Insurance ($)
 
Executive
Long Term
Disability ($)
 
Severance
($)(a)
 
All
Other
($)(b)
 Total ($) 
R. Srinivasan1,615 
 
 
 
 1,615 
J. Dennedy9,071 1,648
 1,611
 823,571
 
 835,901 
T. Pritchett6,308 268
 363
 
 1,200
 8,139 
J. Seebeck8,455 243
 1,009
 
 
 9,707 
K. Badger10,902 1,311
 1,943
 
 
 14,156 
L. Steinberg9,630 1,400
 1,979
 
 1,200
 14,209 
J. Walker7,424 
 
 
 1,200
 8,624 

(a)On January 7, 2017, the Company and Mr. Dennedy agreed on the terms of a separation agreement in lieu of the terms provided in Mr. Dennedy’s employment agreement with the Company. In exchange for waiving the severance payments to which he is entitled under his employment agreement, Mr. Dennedy received a cash payment of $823,571.
(b)Consists of matching funds for health savings accounts.

2022

Name

401(k) Company Match ($)

Executive Life Insurance ($)

Executive Long Term Disability ($)

All Other ($)

Total ($)

R. Srinivasan

  14,996

  —

  3,793

  —

  18,789

D. Wood

  7,185

  444

  906

  1,200

  9,735

K. Badger

  9,924

  2,193

  2,432

  —

  14,549

D. DeMarinis

  11,876

  —

  —

  900

  12,776

C. Robertson

  9,024

  1,219

  1,008

  —

  11,251

(a) Consists of matching funds for health savings accounts.


Grants of Plan-Based Awards


The following table and related notes summarize grants of equity and non-equity incentive compensation awards to our Named Executive Officers for fiscal year 2017. Awards of stock options prior to September 15, 2016, were made under the Company’s 2011 Stock Incentive Plan.2022. All other equity awards were made under the Company’s 2016 Stock2020 Equity Incentive Plan.




28



Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal Year 2017


Name
Grant
Date
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards ($)(1)
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity Incentive
Plan Awards ($)(2)
All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number
of Shares
of Stock
(#)(3)
All Other
Option
Awards:
Number
of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)(4)
Exercise
or
Base
Price
of Option
Awards
($/share)
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
($)(5)
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Ramesh Srinivasan1/3/2017         630,00010.803.68
              
James H. Dennedy9/15/2016     45,75145,75145,751    
 6/30/2016360,500 360,500360,500        
            
Tony Pritchett10/25/2016      9,000   90,810
 9/15/2016      2,089   22,707
             
Janine K. Seebeck9/15/2016   13,16613,16613,166     
 6/30/2016127,400127,400127,400        
             
Kyle C. Badger10/26/2016      10,000  100,900
10/25/2016      10,000  100,900
9/15/2016      6,399  69,557
6/30/2016 130,000146,900       
6/30/2016         17,59810.473.81
            
Larry Steinberg10/26/2016         35,000  353,150
 9/15/2016          10,782  117,200
 6/30/2016  157,500177,943          
 6/30/2016           29,65210.473.81
            
Jimmie Walker, Jr.10/26/2016         35,000  353,150
 10/25/2016          35,000  353,150
 9/15/2016          2,638  28,675
 6/30/2016  74,25074,250          
 6/30/2016           7,25710.473.81

2022

 

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity Incentive
Plan Awards ($)(1)

All Other Stock Awards:

All Other Option Awards:

 

 

Name

Grant Date

Threshold ($)

Target
($)

Maximum ($)

Number of Shares of Stock
(#)(2)

Number of Securities Underlying Option
(#)

Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/share)

Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards
($)(3)

Ramesh Srinivasan

5/24/2022

 

 

 

         5,384

 

 

    204,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dave Wood

12/1/2021

 

 

 

         3,196

 

 

    137,500

 

12/1/2021

 

 

 

         5,551

 

 

    137,500

 

5/26/2021

  —

 120,000

    180,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kyle Badger

5/26/2021

  —

 140,000

    210,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don DeMarinis

5/26/2021

  —

 150,000

    225,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chris Robertson

12/1/2021

 

 

 

         1,423

 

 

      61,250

 

12/1/2021

 

 

 

         2,472

 

 

      61,250

 

5/26/2021

  —

   94,719

    142,079

 

 

 

 

(1)
Amounts shown in the columns under Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards represent fiscal year 20172022 annual threshold, target and maximum cash-based annual incentives granted under the annual incentive plan. Total threshold, target and maximum payouts were conditioned on achievement of weighted goals based on revenue, Adjusted EBITDA and adjusted operating incomeend of year cash balance for each Named Executive Officer. As discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis above, for Messrs. Pritchett, Badger, Steinberg and Walker, the portion of cash-based annual incentives based on financial metrics could not be earned for less than target performance, but the portion based on MBOs had no threshold. The cash-based annual incentives for Mr. Dennedy and Ms. Seebeck were based on achievement of a stock price performance goal. Achievement of the stock price performance goal would have earned each of them a cash payment at the target level, and no additional or incremental payment could have been earned for achievement of any higher or lower stock price. Fiscal year 20172022 payouts for each Named Executive Officer pursuant to these awards are shown in the Summary Compensation Table above in the column titled Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation. Further explanation of potential and actual payouts by component is set forth in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Annual Incentives and – Compensation Highlights, Former CEO and CFO Compensation Focus for Fiscal Year 2017.CD&A.
(2)Long-term equity incentives for each of Mr. Dennedy and Ms. Seebeck consisted of shares of restricted common stock which would vest based on the achievement of a stock price performance goal by March 31, 2018. Achievement of the stock price performance goal would have earned each of them the target level of shares, and no additional or incremental shares could have been earned for achievement of any higher or lower stock price. Further explanation of potential and actual


29



payouts is set forth in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis –Compensation Highlights, Former CEO and CFO Compensation Focus for Fiscal Year 2017.
(3)The share amounts shown represent grants of restricted shares to each Named Executive Officer as part of the executive's annual long-term equity grant.
(4)The share amounts represent SSARs granted at the fair market value of the shares on the grant date as fiscal year 2017 long-term incentive awards. The SSARs are exercisable in thirds beginning on March 31, 2017. All SSARs have a seven-year term, except Mr. Srinivasan’s which have a 4.5-year term.
(5)The dollar amount shown for each equity grant represents the grant date fair value of the SSARs and restricted shares, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The actual value, if any, recognized upon the exercise of a SSAR or vesting of restricted shares will depend upon the market price of the shares on the date the SSAR is exercised or restricted shares vest.

Outstanding Equity Awards


The following table and related notes summarize the outstanding equity awards held by the Named Executive Officers as of March 31, 2017.




30
2022.




Outstanding Equity Awards at 20172022 Fiscal Year-End


NameGrant
Date
Option AwardsStock Awards
Number of
Securities Underlying
Unexercised Options (#)
Option
Exercise
Price ($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number of
Shares
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested (#)(2)
Market
Value of
Shares of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested ($)(3)
ExercisableUnexercisable (1)
Ramesh Srinivasan1/3/2017  630,000(a)10.80 7/3/2021   
           
Tony Pritchett12/30/20113,500  7.95 12/30/2018   
 6/12/20123,500  7.46 6/12/2019   
 8/11/20153,994 1,998 (b)9.60 8/11/2022   
 9/15/2016      1,393 (b)13,164 
 10/25/2016      9,000 (b)85,050 
           
Kyle C. Badger10/31/201111,194  8.49 10/31/2018   
 6/12/201212,886  7.46 6/12/2019   
 6/4/201311,292  12.38 6/4/2020   
 6/3/201414,404  14.43 6/3/2021   
 7/18/2014      22,500 (c)212,625 
 6/2/201518,892 9,446 (c)9.12 6/2/20224,039 (c)38,169 
 6/30/20165,866 11,732 (c)10.47 6/30/2023   
 9/15/2016      4,266 (c)40,334 
 10/25/2016      10,000 (c)94,500 
 10/26/2016      10,000 (c)94,500 
        
Larry Steinberg5/9/201217,513  8.64 5/9/2019   
 6/4/201318,821  12.38 6/4/2020   
 6/3/201423,632  14.43 6/3/2021   
 7/18/2014      31,500 (d)297,675 
 6/2/201532,594 16,297 (d)9.12 6/2/20226,956 (d)65,734 
 6/30/20169,884 19,768 (d)10.47 6/30/2023   
 9/15/2016      7,188 (d)67,927 
 10/26/2016      35,000 (d)330,750 
           
Jimmie Walker, Jr.8/11/20157,106 3,554 (e)9.60 8/11/2022   
 1/5/2016      23,750 (e)224,438 
 6/30/20162,419 4,838 (e)10.47 6/30/2023   
 9/15/2016      1,759 (e)16,623 
 10/25/2016      35,000 (e)330,750 
 10/26/2016      35,000 (e)330,750 

 

 

Option Awards

Stock Awards

 

 

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#)

 

 

 

 

Name

Grant Date

Exercisable

Unexercisable (1)

Option Exercise Price
($)

Option Expiration Date

Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)(2)

Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(3)

Ramesh Srinivasan

2/10/2020

  403,473

196,527 (a)

36.60

8/10/2024

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Dave Wood

8/11/2015

         5,434

 

9.60

8/11/2022

 

 

 

11/3/2017

         4,640

 

11.96

11/3/2024

 

 

 

5/31/2018

            997

 

14.22

5/31/2025

 

 

 

11/19/2020

       45,828

10,112 (b)

20.02

6/2/2027

1,019 (b)

           40,638

 

12/1/2021

 

 

 

 

8,747 (b)

         348,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kyle Badger

6/2/2015

       28,387

 

9.12

6/2/2022

 

 

 

6/30/2016

       17,598

 

10.47

6/30/2023

 

 

 

7/6/2017

       16,250

 

10.20

7/6/2024

 

 

 

5/31/2018

       14,860

 

14.22

5/31/2025

 

 

 

6/20/2019

         9,985

 

22.41

6/20/2026

 

 

 

11/19/2020

       53,466

11,798 (c)

20.02

6/2/2027

1,190 (c)

           47,457

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Don DeMarinis

5/31/2018

         4,423

 

14.22

5/31/2025

 

 

 

6/20/2019

         5,944

 

22.41

6/20/2026

 

 

 

11/19/2020

       39,555

10,534 (d)

20.02

6/2/2027

1,063 (d)

           42,392

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chris Robertson

11/3/2017

         4,640

 

11.96

11/3/2024

 

 

 

5/31/2018

            785

 

14.22

5/31/2025

 

 

 

11/19/2020

       26,297

10,118 (e)

20.02

6/2/2027

 

 

 

12/1/2021

 

 

 

 

3,895 (e)

         155,333

(1)
As of March 31, 2017,2022, the vesting scheduleschedules for the time-vested SSARs waswere as follows:
(a)210,000 on January 3, 2018. The remaining 420,000 SSARs
13,195 vest monthly in equal increments from April 1, 2022 through February 28, 2023; and 186.85 vest daily from April 1, 20182022 through January 1, 2020.December 31, 2022.
(b)1,998
2,528 vest on June 30, 2022; 2,528 vest on September 30, 2022; 2,528 vest on December 31, 2022; and 2,528 vest on March 31, 20182023.
(c)15,312
2,950 vest on June 30, 2022; 2,949 vest on September 30, 2022; 2,949 vest on December 31, 2022; and 2,950 vest on March 31, 20182023.
(d)
2,633 vest on June 30, 2022; 2,634 vest on September 30, 2022; 2,633 vest on December 31, 2022; and 5,8662,634 vest on March 31, 20192023.
(d)(e)26,181
2,530 vest on June 30, 2022; 2,529 vest on September 30, 2022; 2,529 vest on December 31, 2022; and 2,530 vest on March 31, 2018 and 9,884 on March 31, 20192023.
(e)5,973 on March 31, 2018 and 2,419 on March 31, 2019
(2)
As of March 31, 2017,2022, the vesting scheduleschedules for the time-vested stock awards waswere as follows:
(b)9,000
254 vest on October 25, 2017, 696June 30, 2022; 255 vest on September 30, 2022; 1,354 vest on November 30, 2022; 255 vest on December 31, 2022; 255 vest on March 31, 2018;2023; 1,909 vest on November 30, 2023; and 6975,484 vest on November 30, 2024.
(c)
297 vest on June 30, 2022; 297 vest on September 30, 2022; 298 vest on December 31, 2022; and 298 vest on March 31, 20192023.
(c)(d)22,500
265 vest on JulyJune 30, 2022; 266 vest on September 30, 2022; 266 vest on December 31, 2017; 10,000 on October 25, 2017; 6,1722022; and 266 vest on March 31, 2018; 10,0002023.
(e)
602 vest on November 18, 2018; and 2,133 on March 31, 2019
(d)31,500 on July 31, 2017; 10,550 on March 31, 2018; 35,00030, 2022; 849 vest on November 18, 2018;30, 2023; and 3,594 on March 31, 2019


31



(e)35,000 on October 25, 2017; 1,250 on January 5, 2018, 879 on March 31, 2018; 35,0002,444 vest on November 18, 2018; 22,500 on January 5, 2019; and 880 on March 31, 201930, 2024.
(3)
Calculated based on the closing price of the shares on March 31, 2017,2022, of $9.45$39.88 per share.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested


The following table and related notes summarize the exercise of stock options and/or SSARs and the vesting of other stock awards by the Named Executive Officers while they were serving as Named Executive Officers during fiscal year 2017.


2022.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal Year 2017


NameOption AwardsStock Awards
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Exercise (#)
Value
Realized on
Exercise
($)
Number of
Shares
Acquired on
Vesting (#)
Value
Realized on
Vesting ($)(1)
Ramesh Srinivasan
 
 
 
 
James H. Dennedy
 
 2,500
 28,550
 
Tony Pritchett
 
 1,389
 13,126
 
Janine K. Seebeck
 
 1,500
 17,130
 
Kyle C. Badger
 
 9,825
 95,309
 
Larry Steinberg
 
 16,242
 156,934
 
Jimmie Walker, Jr.
 
 3,914
 38,462
 

2022

 

Option Awards

Stock Awards

Name

Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise (#)

Value Realized on Exercise ($)(1)

Number of Shares Acquired on Vesting (#)

Value Realized on Vesting ($)(2)

Ramesh Srinivasan

  505,589

  27,650,662

  —

  —

Dave Wood

  —

  —

  1,861

  74,217

Kyle Badger

  10,433

  546,168

  2,194

  87,497

Don DeMarinis

  —

  —

  2,375

  94,715

Chris Robertson

  —

  —

  716

  28,554

(1)
Value on date of exercise.
(2)
The value realized on vesting of stock awards is determined by multiplying the number of shares underlying the stock awards by the closing price of the shares on the vesting date of the awards.


Termination and Change of Control


The following table and discussion summarize certain information related to the total potential payments which would have been made to the Named Executive Officers in the event of termination of their employment with the Company, including in the event of a change of control, effective March 31, 2017,2022, the last business day of fiscal year 2017.


2022, assuming that the current employment agreements with each of our Named Executive Officers had been in effect at such time.

Employment Agreements. The Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Robertson are each a party to an employment agreement with the Company. Under

If Mr. Srinivasan’s employment agreement is terminated by the employment agreements, if we terminate any of the employment of any of the Named Executive Officers other than Mr. PritchettCompany without cause heor by Mr. Srinivasan for good reason, then subject to his execution of a release of claims, Mr. Srinivasan will be entitled to receive severance equal to one year’stwo years’ then-current base salary and two times the value of his target annual incentive, andbonus performance shares, which will be paid during regular pay intervals over the course of two years. In addition, he will also receive (a) a lump sum amountpayment in cash, on the 60th day after the termination date, equal to the executive’s total premiumafter-tax premiums required to pay for one year24 months of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s health benefit plans.


medical, dental and vision insurance plans; (b) a lump sum payment in cash of his pro-rated bonus for the year of termination based on actual performance with no negative discretion by the Board; and (c) twelve (12) months of accelerated vesting of all equity compensation awards that are subject to time or service-based vesting and were unvested and outstanding on the termination date. However, if notice of non-renewal is given within the last 12 months of the initial three-year employment term severance will only be paid for a 12-month period. If the Named Executive Officer terminates his employment with the Company for good reason, he may terminate his employment andsuch termination occurs within three months before or 24 months after a change in control, Mr. Srinivasan will receive two times the sum of his severance benefits. then-current base salary and target annual bonus, two times the COBRA payment and 100% release of any post-closing restrictions related to equity awards that were deemed vested as a result of the change of control. In addition, upon any termination of employment, Mr. Srinivasan will receive accrued but unpaid base salary and payment for any unused vacation and unreimbursed expenses.

For Mr. Srinivasan, good reason means (i) a reduction in his base salary or target bonus opportunity, (ii) a material diminution in his authority, duties or responsibilities (including, without limitation, his no longer being the CEO of a publicly-traded company)company or the requirement that he report to anyone other than the Company’s board of directors or following a change in control he is not made the chief executive officer of the ultimate parent of the resulting entity), (iii) his removal as a member of the board of directors (other than by yourhis voluntary resignation), (iv) any other action that constitutes a willful and material breach by the Company of a material provision of his employment agreement, or (v) a material reduction in the benefits provided to him that is not part of a broader reduction of benefits applicable to substantially all other officers of the Company, or (vi) a material breach of the agreement by the Company (including a failure to pay current compensation or benefits when due), and the Company fails to materially cure such condition within 30 days.days of notice of the breach. For the other Named Executive Officers, good reason is limited to where the Company changes the Named Executive Officer’s position such that his compensation or responsibilities are substantially lessened, and the Company fails to cure such situation within 30 days after notice.



32




If Mr. Pritchett’s employment with the Company is terminatedterminates the employment of any of the other Named Executive Officers other than Mr. Robertson without cause, or for change of position in the 24 months following a change of controlwe must pay severance equal to 12 months’ salary and reimbursement of the Company, Mr. Pritchett is entitled to his annual salary and target annual incentive plus a lump sum amount equal to hisexecutive’s total premium for one year12 months of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s health benefit plans. If the executive’s compensation is reduced by more than 10%, other than a general reduction that affects all similarly situated executives, or if at any time prior to a change in control the executive no longer reports to the CEO, the executive may terminate his employment if the Company fails to materially cure such condition within 30 days following notice of such condition by the executive, and the termination will be deemed to be a termination without cause and the executive is entitled to his or her severance benefits. In the event that any of the otherthese Named Executive Officers are terminated without cause or by the executive for a change of positiongood reason in the 24 months following a change of control of the Company, the Named Executive Officerexecutive is entitled to severance pay equal to two times the sum of the executive’s12 months’ salary and a pro rata portion of target annual incentive plus a lump sum amount equal toand reimbursement of the executive’s total premium for one year12 months’ of COBRA continuation coverage under the Company’s health benefit plans.


benefit.

If the Company terminated the employment of Mr. Robertson without cause as of March 31, 2022, we must pay severance equal to 11 weeks base salary under the Company’s general severance policy.

During the term of his employment and for 24 months thereafter, Mr. Srinivasan is subject to the Company’s standard confidentiality and non-disclosure requirements, as well as non-competition and non-solicitation obligations, except that if the term of the employment agreement expires at the end of the initial three-year term, the non-competition provisions will only apply for 12 months following termination. Following a termination of employment of any other Named Executive Officer for any reason, eachsuch Named Executive Officer is prohibited for a one-year12-month period following termination from being employed by, owning, operating, controlling, or being connected with any businesscertain businesses that competescompete with the Company. Each executive’sThe employment agreement for each of the other Named Executive Officer also contains an indefinite non-disclosure provision for the protection of the Company’s confidential information and a one-year12 month non-solicitation of Company employees.



Termination and Change of Control


Voluntary Termination or Termination for Cause ($)(1)
Ramesh
Srinivasan
Tony
Pritchett
Kyle
Badger
Larry
Steinberg
Jimmie
Walker
Base Salary and Incentive
Accelerated Vesting
Termination without Cause or by Employee for Good Reason ($)(2)     
Base Salary and Incentive1,050,000
 230,000
390,000 420,000 500,000
 
Health Insurance (3)15,655
 19,974
24,636 20,520 22,184
 
Accelerated Vesting
 85,050
307,125 297,675 555,188
 
Total1,065,655
 335,024
721,761 738,195 1,077,372
 
Change of Control ($)(4)

     
Base Salary and Incentive2,100,000
 345,000
780,000 840,000 1,000,000
 
Health Insurance15,655
 19,974
24,636 20,520 22,184
 
Accelerated Vesting/SSARs (3)
 
3,123 5,378 
 
Accelerated Vesting/Stock (3)
 98,214
385,628 431,336 571,811
 
Total2,115,655
 463,188
1,193,387 1,297,234 1,593,995
 
Death or Disability ($)(5)     
Accelerated Vesting/SSARs (3)
 0
3,123 5,378 
 
Accelerated Vesting/Stock (3)
 98,214
385,628 431,336 571,811
 
Total
 98,214
388,751 436,714 571,811
 

Voluntary Termination for Cause ($)(1)

Ramesh Srinivasan

Dave Wood

Kyle Badger

Don DeMarinis

Chris Robertson

Base Salary and Incentive

  —

  —

  —

  —

  —

Accelerated Vesting

  —

  —

  —

  —

  —

Termination without Cause or by Employee for Good Reason ($(2)

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary and Incentive

  3,000,000

  275,000

  280,000

  250,000

  53,900

Health Insurance (3)

  57,938

  24,129

  29,244

  16,888

  —

Accelerated Vesting

  644,609

  —

  —

  —

  —

Total

  3,702,546

  299,129

  309,244

  266,888

  53,900

Change of Control ($)(4)

 

 

 

 

 

Base Salary and Incentive

  2,400,000

  412,500

  420,000

  400,000

  53,900

Health Insurance (3)

  115,875

  24,129

  29,244

  16,888

  —

Accelerated Vesting/SSARs

  644,609

  200,824

  234,308

  209,205

  200,943

Accelerated Vesting/Stock

  —

  168,094

  47,457

  42,392

  56,749

Total

  3,160,484

  805,547

  731,010

  668,485

  311,593

Death or Disability ($)(5)

 

 

 

 

 

Accelerated Vesting/SSARs

  644,609

  200,824

  234,308

  209,205

  200,943

Accelerated Vesting/Stock

  —

  —

  —

  —

  —

Total

  644,609

  200,824

  234,308

  209,205

  200,943

(1) A “voluntary termination” includes death, disability, or legal incompetence.

(2) For Mr. Srinivasan, “cause” is defined as (i) conviction of a crime involving misappropriation of money or other property or conviction of a felony, or a guilty plea or plea of nolo contendere with respect to a felony, (ii) violationsconduct that is Prohibited Activity under the confidentiality, non-competition and non-solicitation clausessection of his employment agreement, (iii) conduct that breaches of his duty of loyalty to the Company or his willful misconduct, any of which materially injures the Company, (iv) a willful and material breach of his material obligations under any agreement entered into between him and the Company that materially injures the Company, or (v) failure to substantially perform his reasonable duties with the Company (other than by reason of yourhis disability). that materially injures the Company. For the other Named Executive Officers, “cause” is defined as (i) breach of employment agreement or any other duty to the Company, (ii) dishonesty, fraud, or failure to abide by the published ethical standards, conflicts of interest, or material breach of Company policy, (iii) conviction of a felony crime or crime involving misappropriation of money or other Company property, or (iv) misconduct, malfeasance, or insubordination, or (v) gross failure to perform (not including failure to achieve quantitative



33



targets).insubordination. For Mr. Srinivasan, good reason means (i) a reduction in his base salary or target bonus opportunity, (ii) a material diminution in his authority, duties or responsibilities (including, without limitation, his no longer being the CEO of a publicly-traded company)company or the requirement that he report to anyone other than the Company’s Board of Directors or following a Change in Control he is not made the chief executive officer of the ultimate parent of the resulting entity), (iii) his removal as a member of the Board (other than by voluntary resignation), or failure to be appointed to the board of directors (other than by your voluntary resignation),of the ultimate parent of any resulting entity following a change in control, (iv) any other action that constitutes a willful and material breach by the CompanyAgilysys of a material provision of his employment agreement, or (v) a material reduction in the benefits provided to him that is not part of a broader reduction of benefits applicable to substantially all other officers of the Company, andor (vii) a material breach of his employment agreement by Agilysys, including the Company failsfailure to materially cure such condition within 30 days.pay his current compensation or benefits when due. For the other Named Executive Officers, good reason is limitedmeans (i) a reduction in base salary or target bonus eligibility by more than 10% from its then current level, other than a general reduction in base salary or target bonus eligibility that affects all similarly situated executives in substantially the same proportions, or (ii) at any time prior to wherea change in control of the Company, changes the Named Executive Officer’s position such that his compensation or responsibilities are substantially lessened,Officer no longer reports to the CEO, and the Company fails to cure any such situation within 30 days after notice.

(3) Health Insurance consists of health care and dental care benefits. The amount reflects 12 monthsreimbursement of COBRA benefits for the Named Executive Officers that participate in the Company’s plans. These benefits have been calculated based on actual cost to us for fiscal year 2017.

applicable period.

(4) Severance payments in the event of a change of control are subject to a double trigger such that severance benefits are provided only upon a combination of a change of control and a qualified termination. SSARs and restricted shares vest upon a change of control. For SSARs (except as qualified below) the value of accelerated vesting is calculated using the closing price of $9.45$39.88 per share on March 31, 2017,2022, less the exercise price per share for the total number of SSARs accelerated. The value of restricted shares upon vesting reflects that same $9.45$39.88 closing price. Values represent potential vesting under a hypothetical change of control situation on March 31, 2017.

2022.

(5) All SSARs and restricted shares vest upon death or disability.




EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION


The following table provides certain information with respect to all of the Company’s equity compensation plans in effect as of March 31, 2017.


  Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights 
Number of  Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation 
Plans
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders (2000 Stock Option Plan for Outside Directors and 2000, 2006, 2011 and 2016 Stock Incentive Plans) 1,094,978
 
$10.44
 1,862,597
    
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders 
 
 
Total 1,094,978
 
$10.44
 1,862,597



PROPOSAL 2
ADVISORY VOTE REGARDING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


2022.

 

Number of Securities to be Issued upon Exercise of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

Number of Securities Remaining Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders (2011 and 2016 Stock Incentive Plans and 2020 Equity Incentive Plan)

  2,172,939

  24.02

  649,895

Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders

Total

  2,172,939

                                 24.02

  649,895

PROPOSAL 2

ADVISORY VOTE REGARDING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (“Dodd-Frank Act”) and SEC rules require us to allow our shareholders to vote, on a non-binding, advisory basis, on whether to approve the compensation of our Named Executive Officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, in accordance with the SEC’s compensation disclosure rules. As described more fully in our CD&A section of this Proxy Statement, our compensation programs applicable to our Named Executive Officers are designed to retain executives who can significantly contribute to our success, reward the achievement of specific annual and long-term goals and strategic objectives, and tie a significant portion of compensation to the long-term performance of our shares to align executive pay and shareholders’ interests. The Compensation Committee continually reviews the compensation programs for our Named Executive Officers to ensure the alignment of our executive compensation structure with our shareholders’ interests and market practices. As a result of this review, the Compensation Committee:



34




Maintained base salaries and targetfor most of the named executive officers at fiscal year 2021 levels;
Granted additional long-term equity incentive awards only to those named executive officers whom it believed were disproportionately at risk of retention due to tightening labor markets;
Maintained annual incentivesincentive opportunities for the named executive officers generally at the same level as fiscal year 2021;
Set annual incentive performance targets for fiscal year 2017 at the same levels as fiscal year 2016;
Focused annual incentives2022 based on improvements over pre-pandemic fiscal year 2016 revenue2020 results; and
Structured long-term
In its discretion, awarded a portion of annual incentives to reward increasesour named executive officers, in shareholder value.view of continued improvements in the Company’s fiscal Adjusted EBITDA and cash balance in fiscal year 2022 over fiscal years 2021 and 2020.

We are asking shareholders to approve our Named Executive Officers’ compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. Currently, we ask shareholders to vote on such compensation annually. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation, and the philosophy, objectives, and structure applicable to such compensation. This advisory vote is not binding on the Company, the Compensation Committee, or our board of directors; however, we value the opinions of our shareholders and to the extent there is any significant vote against this proposal, we will consider our shareholders’ concerns and evaluate whether any actions are necessary to address those concerns. Accordingly, we are asking our shareholders to vote “FOR” the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:


“RESOLVED, that the Company’s shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the Named Executive Officers, as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20172022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the discussion under Executive Compensation, including the 20172022 compensation tables and the related disclosure and narratives to those tables.”



Recommendation of the Board of Directors

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” PROPOSAL 2. PROXY CARDS RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” PROPOSAL 2 UNLESS THE SHAREHOLDER SPECIFIES OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.



AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT


The Audit Committee oversees the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the board of directors. The Audit Committee’s activities are governed by a written charter adopted by the board of directors, the Amended and Restated Audit Committee Charter, which is available at the Company’s website www.agilysys.com.www.agilysys.com. The Audit Committee currently consists of three directors, all of whom are independent in accordance with the rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market, Section 10A(m) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Board has determined that Directors Donald Colvin and John Mutch each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the SEC.


Management has the primary responsibility for the Company’s financial statements and the reporting process, including the system of internal controls over financial reporting. Grant Thornton LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, audits the annual financial statements prepared by management and expresses an opinion on whether those financial statements conform with United States generally accepted accounting principles, and also audits the internal controls over financial reporting and management’s assessment of those controls. The Audit Committee hires the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and monitors these processes.


In carrying out its responsibilities, the Audit Committee has reviewed and has discussed with the Company’s management the Company’s 20172022 audited financial statements. Management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles. In addition, the Audit Committee discussed with the Company’s financial management and independent registered public accounting firm the overall scope and plans for the audit. The Audit Committee also met with the independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss the results of the audit, their evaluation of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, including both the design and usefulness of such internal controls, and the overall quality of the Company’s financial reporting.




35



The Audit Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16, Communication with Audit Committees, as adopted bythe applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Board.


Oversight Board and the SEC.

The Audit Committee has also received annual written disclosures from Grant Thornton regarding their independence from the Company and its management as required by the applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm their independence, and has considered the compatibility of non-audit services with the registered public accounting firm’s independence.


Based on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the board of directors that the Company’s 20172022 audited financial statements be included in the Company’s 20172022 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.


2022.

Submitted by the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors as of June 14, 2017


May 24, 2022

Donald Colvin, Chairman

Jerry

Dana Jones

John Mutch




PROPOSAL 3
RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


PROPOSAL 3

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF

INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

By NASDAQ and SEC rules, appointment of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (“Independent Accountant”) is the direct responsibility of the Audit Committee, and the Audit Committee has appointed Grant Thornton LLP as our Independent Accountant for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2017.


2023.

Shareholder ratification of the selection of Grant Thornton as our Independent Accountant is not required by our Amended Code of Regulations or otherwise; however, the board of directors has determined to seek shareholder ratification of that selection to provide shareholders an avenue to express their views on this important matter. If our shareholders fail to ratify the selection, the Audit Committee will seek to understand the reasons for the vote against ratification and will take those views into account in this and future appointments. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee in its discretion may direct the appointment of a different Independent Accountant at any time during the year if it is determined that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our shareholders.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF GRANT THORNTON AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. PROXY CARDS RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” PROPOSAL 3 UNLESS THE SHAREHOLDER SPECIFIES OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.

The Audit Committee reviewed the fees of Grant Thornton LLP, our Independent Accountant for fiscal year 2017, and of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), our Independent Accountant for fiscal year 2015.2022. Fees for services rendered by Grant Thornton and PwC for fiscal years 20172022 and 20162021 were:




36



Fiscal
Year
Audit
Fees ($)
Audit-Related
Fees ($)
Tax
Fees ($)
All Other
Fees ($)
2017 (Grant Thornton)

571,347






2017 (PwC)

19,504



2016 (Grant
Thornton)

680,281






2016 (PwC)211,400

2,700

Fiscal Year

Audit Fees ($)

2022

  669,395

2021

  667,383

“Audit Fees” consist of fees billed for professional services provided for the annual audit of our financial statements, annual audit of internal control over financial reporting, review of the interim financial statements included in quarterly reports, and services that are normally provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. “Audit- Related Fees” generally include fees for employee benefits plan audits, business acquisitions, and accounting consultations.relate to professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements. “Tax Fees” include tax compliance and tax adviceconsulting services. “All Other Fees” generally relate to professional services providednot included in connection with non-audit acquisition activities.


the foregoing categories, including services related to other regulatory reporting requirements.

Representatives of Grant Thornton are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have an opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and will be available to respond to appropriate questions. Representatives of PwC are not expected to be present at the Annual Meeting.


The Audit Committee adopted an Audit and Non-Audit Services Pre-Approval Policy (the “Policy”) to ensure compliance with SEC and other rules and regulations relating to auditor independence, with the goal of safeguarding the continued independence of our Independent Accountant. The Pre-Approval Policy sets forth the procedures and conditions pursuant to which audit, review, and attest services and non-audit services to be provided to the Company by our Independent Accountant may be pre-approved. The Audit Committee is required to pre-approve the audit and non- audit services performed by our Independent Accountant to assure that the provision of such services does not impair independence. Unless a type of service to be provided has received pre-approval as set forth in the Pre-Approval Policy, it will require separate pre-approval by the Audit Committee before commencement of the engagement. Any proposed service that has received pre-approval but which will exceed pre-approved cost limits will require separate pre- approvalpre-approval by the Audit Committee. All audit, non-audit, and tax services were pre-approved by the Audit Committee during fiscal years 20172022 and 2016.



2021.


Recommendation of the Board of Directors

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT SHAREHOLDERS VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF GRANT THORNTON AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. PROXY CARDS RECEIVED BY THE COMPANY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” PROPOSAL 3 UNLESS THE SHAREHOLDER SPECIFIES OTHERWISE ON THE PROXY CARD.

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS


Policy on Approval of Related Person Transactions

All related person transactions with the Company require the prior approval or ratification by our Audit Committee. The board of directors adopted Related Person Transaction Procedures to formalize the procedures by which our Audit Committee reviews and approves or ratifies related person transactions. The procedures set forth the scope of transactions covered, the process for reporting such transactions, and the review process. Covered transactions include any transaction, arrangement, or relationship with the Company in which any director, executive officer, or other related person has a direct or indirect material interest, except for business travel and expense payments, share ownership, and executive compensation approved by the board of directors. Transactions are reportable to the Company’s General Counsel, who will oversee the initial review of the reported transaction and notify the Audit Committee of transactions within the scope of the procedures, and the Audit Committee will determine whether to approve or ratify the transaction. Through our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, we make a formal yearly inquiry of all of our executive officers and directors for purposes of disclosure of related person transactions, and any such newly revealed related person transactions are conveyed to the Audit Committee. All officers and directors are charged with updating this information with our internal legal counsel.



HOUSEHOLDING




37



Some banks, brokers and other nominee record holders may be participating in the practice of “householding.” This means that only one copy of either the noticeNotice of Internet availabilityAvailability of the proxy statement Proxy Materials or of this proxy statement and Annual Report on Form 10-K may have been sent to multiple shareholders sharing an address unless the shareholders provide contrary instructions. We will promptly deliver a separate copy of these documents to you if you call or write us at: Agilysys, Inc., 425 Walnut Street,1000 Windward Concourse, Suite 1800, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202,250, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005, Attention: Secretary; telephone (770) 810-7800.


If you want to receive separate copies of our proxy statements and annual reports to shareholders or Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in the future, or if you are receiving multiple copies and would like to receive only one copy for your household, you should contact your bank, broker or other nominee record holder, or you may contact us at the above address or telephone number.



OTHER MATTERS


The Board is not aware of any matter to come before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders other than those mentioned in the accompanying Notice. If other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, the persons named in the accompanying proxy card intend, to the extent permitted by law, to vote using their best judgment on such matters.



SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS


Shareholders who, in accordance with SEC Rule 14a-8, wish to present proposals for inclusion in the proxy materials to be distributed in connection with the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders must submit their proposals so that they are received by our Secretary at our Alpharetta office, located at 1000 Windward Concourse, Suite 250, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005, no later than the close of business on April 18, 2018.March 21, 2023. Each proposal submitted should be accompanied by the name and address of the shareholder submitting the proposal and the number of common shares owned. If the proponent is not a shareholder of record, proof of beneficial ownership should also be submitted. All proposals must be a proper subject for action and comply with the proxy rules of the SEC.


In order for a shareholder to bring a matter properly before the 20182023 Annual Meeting present (other than a matter brought pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8), the shareholder must comply with the requirements set forth in our Amended Code of Regulations, including: (i) be a shareholder of record at the time notice of the matter is given and at the time of the meeting, (ii) be entitled to vote at the meeting, and (iii) have given timely written notice of the matter to the Secretary. A shareholder’s notice of a matter the shareholder wishes to present at the 20182023 Annual Meeting (other than a matter brought pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8), must be received by our Secretary at our Alpharetta office, located at 1000 Windward Concourse, Suite 250, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005, no earlier than May 18, 2018,April 28, 2023, and no later than June 18, 2018.



May 28, 2023.


Any shareholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting on August 16, 2017,26, 2022, may make a request in writing and we will mail, at no charge, a copy of our 20172022 Annual Report, including the financial statements and schedules required to be filed with the SEC pursuant to Rule 13a-1 under the Exchange Act, for the most recent fiscal year. Written requests should be directed to Agilysys, Inc., Attn: Investor Relations, 1000 Windward Concourse, Suite 250, Alpharetta, Georgia 30005.


Please sign and return your proxy card promptly or vote via the Internet or telephone. For your convenience, a return envelope is enclosed requiring no additional postage if mailed in the United States.



CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION


This proxy statement and other publicly available documents, including the documents incorporated herein and therein by reference, contain, and our officers and representatives may from time to time make, "forward-looking



38



statements"“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements can be identified by words such as: "anticipate," "intend," "plan," "goal," "seek," "believe," "project," "estimate," "expect," "strategy," "future," "likely," "may," "should," "will"“anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “goal,” “seek,” “believe,” “project,” “estimate,” “expect,” “strategy,” “future,” “likely,” “may,” “should,” “will” and similar references to future periods. Forward-looking statements are neither historical facts nor assurances of future performance. Instead, they are based only on our current beliefs, expectations and assumptions regarding the future of our business, future plans and strategies, projections, anticipated events and trends, the economy and other future conditions. Because forward-looking statements relate to the future, they are subject to inherent uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict and many of which are outside of our control. Our actual results and financial condition may differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements. Therefore, you should not rely on any of these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our actual results and financial condition to differ materially from those indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others, our ability to achieve operational efficiencies and meet customer demand for products and solutionsservices and the risks described in the Company'sCompany’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including those listed in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2017.2022. Any forward-looking statement made by us is based only on information currently available and speaks only as of the date on which it is made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement made herein or any forward-looking statement that may be made from time to time, whether written or oral, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.


img117445957_2.jpg 

MMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMM 000004 ENDORSEMENT_LINE______________ SACKPACK_____________ MR ASAMPLE DESIGNATION (IF ANY) ADD 1 ADD 2 ADD 3 ADD 4 ADD 5 ADD 6 Using a black ink pen, mark your votes with an X as shown in this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMM C123456789 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext 000000000.000000 ext Your vote matters – here’s how to vote! You may vote online or by phone instead of mailing this card. Votes submitted electronically must be received by 1:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on August 25, 2022 Online Go to www.investorvote.com/AGYS or scan the QR code — login details are located in the shaded bar below. Phone Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US territories and Canada Save paper, time and money! Sign up for electronic delivery at www.investorvote.com/AGYS 2022 Annual Meeting Proxy Card 1234 5678 9012 345 • IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • Proposals — The Board of Directors recommend a vote FOR all the nominees listed and FOR Proposals 2 and 3. A 1. The election of each director nominee named herein (proposal 1) + 01 - Donald A. Colvin 02 - Dana Jones 03 - Jerry Jones 04 - Michael A. Kaufman 05 - Melvin L. Keating 06 - John Mutch 07 - Ramesh Srinivasan Mark here to vote FOR all nominees Mark here to WITHHOLD vote from all nominees 01 020304050607 For All EXCEPT - To withhold a vote for one or more nominees, mark the box to the left and the corresponding numbered box(es) to the right. For Against Abstain For Against Abstain 2. Approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation 3. Ratification of the appointment of Grant Thornton LLP as our of our named executive officers set forth in the attached Proxy independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal Statement (proposal 2) year ending March 31, 2023 (proposal 3) In their discretion, the proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournments thereof Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to count. Please date and sign below. B Please sign exactly as name(s) appears hereon. Joint owners should each sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, corporate officer, trustee, guardian, or custodian, please give full title. Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below. Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box. Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box. MR A SAMPLE (THIS AREA IS SET UPTO ACCOMMODATE C 1234567890 JNT 140 CHARACTERS) MR A SAMPLE AND MR A SAMPLE AND MR ASAMPLE AND MR ASAMPLE AND MR ASAMPLE AND 1UPX 547809 MR ASAMPLE AND MR ASAMPLE AND MR ASAMPLE AND MMMMMMM + 03O2GA




39




a02n74bzero001.jpg


40

img117445957_3.jpg 

Important notice regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The material is available at: www.agilysys.com/en/company/investor-relations Small steps make an impact. Help the environment by consenting to receive electronic delivery, sign up at www.investorvote.com/AGYS • IF VOTING BY MAIL, SIGN, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE. • Agilysys, Inc. + Notice of 2022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Proxy Solicited by Board of Directors for Annual Meeting — August 26, 2022 Kyle Badger and Ramesh Srinivasan, or any of them, each with the power of substitution, are hereby authorized to represent and vote the shares of the undersigned, with all the powers which the undersigned would possess if personally present, at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Agilysys, Inc. to be held on August 26, 2022 or at any postponement or adjournment thereof. Shares represented by this proxy will be voted as directed by the shareholder. If no such directions are indicated, the Proxies will have authority to vote FOR the election of the Board of Directors and FOR items 2 and 3. In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting. (Items to be voted appear on reverse side) Non-Voting Items C Change of Address — Please print new address below. Comments — Please print your comments below. +




a02n74bzero002.jpg


41